Dear friends Nad, Dirk and Annie,

Thank you so much !

Warmest regards,

Regina

******************************************

Dear Ryan,

What you want for me or from Brazil, please tell me.

Your friend,

Regina

******************************************
Dear Beate,

Apologies again! Also I would like to have one of your works or articles at
the museum.
Would you like it?

All my friendship,

Regina

******************************************
Dear all,

My sincere apologies for all of this and please continue your talk, rhizome
is a wonderful list and I learn a lot with all your messages. I will be out
for a while, do not worry about this. Go ahead!

Yours,

Regina

******************************************
Dear Roman Minaev,

Let's forget all of this? I hope that we will be yet good friends.

Also I would like to invite you to be one of the museum's artists, would you
like?

Your friend,

Regina

******************************************

----- Original Message -----
From: "aabrahams" <aabrahams@bram.org>
To: "Regina Pinto" <reginapinto@arteonline.arq.br>; <list@rhizome.org>;
<szpako@yahoo.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 6:58 AM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: martin kippenberger has left the building

I agree with Michael, he is right

Please take care Regina

Annie Abrahams

On 4/8/06, Michael Szpakowski <szpako@yahoo.com> wrote:
> HI Regina
> I'm sorry to hear you are not well.
> You need to take care of yourself & not worry about
> stuff so much.
> You and your museum are a force for good.
> You've presented lots of peoples' work in an
> enormously generous way & you've made beautiful work
> yourself.
> I don't *think* anyone wants to make you unhappy or to
> criticise you unjustifiably. If they do they are not
> worth worrying about.
> Concentrate on getting better & then come back to
> Rhizome & to the other lists.
> If the lists can't absorb & benefit from your
> personality, your work, your thoughts and your care
> for the work of others, then they in turn are not
> worth worrying about.
> Take it easy & get better.
> warmest wishes
> michael
>
> --- Regina Pinto <reginapinto@arteonline.arq.br>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ryan,
> >
> > No, I am not OK. I am completely up set, that is it.
> > I would never do
> > anything performative which such horrible them.
> > The message I sent to you and Curt where sent by the
> > same reason, I want to
> > discover why people were so agressive with me
> > because my outlook sent a
> > message by mistake. By the way, I imagine that it
> > was the first time that
> > someone received a message from mailia here. If you
> > searh the archives of
> > March 21st, probably you will realize this. I am
> > always looking for any sign
> > of the reason of this negative feedback in the
> > messages I receive from
> > rhizome. It is a completely stressing situation. Bu
> > the way, I admire you a
> > lot, you were the only one to help me that day.
> >
> > I do not post to rhizome since March 23, that day I
> > sent a message with two
> > links for you, saying this:
> >
> > "Thanks for the link Ryan, quite good!
> > Below two good texts in English by Suely Rolnik
> > about Lygia Clark. There you
> > will find good information about relational objects,
> > as I have promised."
> >
> > Imediately someone posted a message:
> >
> > DO NOT TEST
> > DO NOT TEST
> > DO NOT TEST
> >
> > After this I received that message, I stop to send
> > messages and became
> > completely stressed trying to discover why someone
> > that I do not know and
> > that I have never talked before could do this kind
> > of thing with me..
> >
> > Today someone here wrote telling that there were
> > less messages to rhizome.
> > Another one reply right away telling that it was
> > very good. After this I
> > received the message from Beate with this subject
> > "martin kippenberger has
> > left the building" (I related this with the previous
> > messages - who is not
> > posting here - me), the worse is that she sent this
> > to Rhizome and to
> > another of my emails, I do not belong the list
> > serverfestival@listner.org
> > from where the email was sent, so that it must be
> > sent as bcc. So I imagined
> > that she was very interested that I read that
> > message, and the rest you
> > already know.
> >
> > I am a very sensitive person, to you have an idea,
> > I have stoped to work in
> > my projects since March 23 rd, I do not get to do
> > anything. During three
> > days I was on the bed with the world rotating around
> > me because of my high
> > blood pressure. In fact I can not understand why
> > someone like me that are
> > always working to net.art and announcing other
> > artists and their works, and
> > Art and Culture deserved that kind of feedback from
> > the list.
> >
> > My sincere apologies, but if one of you could tell
> > me what I have done to
> > deserve this, it will be wonderful.
> >
> > To conclude I would like to say that the rhizomers
> > which I sent a copy of
> > the my message to Beate are chosen among my friends
> > or rhizomers that know
> > me there are much time or rhizomers that I think
> > that are vip. I have not
> > against them
> >
> > I hope it should clarify why I am not okay.
> >
> > Yours,
> >
> > Regina
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ryan Griffis" <ryan.griffis@gmail.com>
> > To: "Regina Pinto" <reginapinto@arteonline.arq.br>
> > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 5:21 PM
> > Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: martin kippenberger
> > has left the building
> >
> >
> > > Hi Regina,
> > > i certainly did not mean my post to be an insult,
> > but after seeing your
> > > response to Beate and remembering your message to
> > Curt and myself earlier
> > > in the week... there seems an odd pattern.
> > > as far as i can tell none of the posts that have
> > attracted your attention
> > > seem to be directed at you in any way whatsoever.
> > so my conclusion is that
> > > your messages are somehow performative and meant
> > to "get at" something
> > > else - to redirect our attention.
> > > if not, i meant my question genuinely: "are you
> > OK?"
> > > it's not really my place to ask, as i don't know
> > you at all... but i
> > > thought a public display of concern was warranted.
> > > at any rate, i have never and will never post
> > anything personal and
> > > malicious on the list, and would certainly never
> > do anything to
> > > purposefully offend or insult you. i don't think
> > many people on rhizome
> > > would either. your posts to rhizome are welcome
> > and interesting. (still
> > > going through some of your links re Lygia Clark,
> > etc)
> > > take care,
> > > ryan
> > >
> > > On Apr 7, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Regina Pinto wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dear Ryan and others,
> > >>
> > >> I did not sent this message to rhizome. I sent it
> > to Beate first and as
> > >> she did not answered fastly and I was really
> > completely astonished I
> > >> sent tosome other rhizomers, but not for you or
> > to the list . It was
> > >> Beate that forward it to rhizome . I have already
> > answered her
> > >> explanation which you can see below. If you or
> > other person need more
> > >> explanation, just tell me.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you Beate, and my apologies to you and
> > other rhizomes. However you
> > >> do not need to send messages to my other email. I
> > am in Rhizome Raw yet.
> > >> I have been really confused since some rhizome
> > members told me that my
> > >> emails were not welcome, just because my outlook
> > software sent a message
> > >> by mistake. I do not think that it is a reason
> > for that and then I became
> > >> to imagine why I received this kind of feedback.
> > Your message reach me in
> > >> this difficult period of my on line life . That
> > is it.
> > >>
> > >> All best,
> > >>
> > >> Regina
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > +
> > -> post: list@rhizome.org
> > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> > -> subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> > +
> > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set
> > out in the
> > Membership Agreement available online at
> > http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
> >
>
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>

Hello Michael,

Thank you so much!

A hug,

Regina

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Szpakowski" <szpako@yahoo.com>
To: "Regina Pinto" <reginapinto@arteonline.arq.br>; <list@rhizome.org>
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: martin kippenberger has left the building

> HI Regina
> I'm sorry to hear you are not well.
> You need to take care of yourself & not worry about
> stuff so much.
> You and your museum are a force for good.
> You've presented lots of peoples' work in an
> enormously generous way & you've made beautiful work
> yourself.
> I don't *think* anyone wants to make you unhappy or to
> criticise you unjustifiably. If they do they are not
> worth worrying about.
> Concentrate on getting better & then come back to
> Rhizome & to the other lists.
> If the lists can't absorb & benefit from your
> personality, your work, your thoughts and your care
> for the work of others, then they in turn are not
> worth worrying about.
> Take it easy & get better.
> warmest wishes
> michael
>
> --- Regina Pinto <reginapinto@arteonline.arq.br>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ryan,
>>
>> No, I am not OK. I am completely up set, that is it.
>> I would never do
>> anything performative which such horrible them.
>> The message I sent to you and Curt where sent by the
>> same reason, I want to
>> discover why people were so agressive with me
>> because my outlook sent a
>> message by mistake. By the way, I imagine that it
>> was the first time that
>> someone received a message from mailia here. If you
>> searh the archives of
>> March 21st, probably you will realize this. I am
>> always looking for any sign
>> of the reason of this negative feedback in the
>> messages I receive from
>> rhizome. It is a completely stressing situation. Bu
>> the way, I admire you a
>> lot, you were the only one to help me that day.
>>
>> I do not post to rhizome since March 23, that day I
>> sent a message with two
>> links for you, saying this:
>>
>> "Thanks for the link Ryan, quite good!
>> Below two good texts in English by Suely Rolnik
>> about Lygia Clark. There you
>> will find good information about relational objects,
>> as I have promised."
>>
>> Imediately someone posted a message:
>>
>> DO NOT TEST
>> DO NOT TEST
>> DO NOT TEST
>>
>> After this I received that message, I stop to send
>> messages and became
>> completely stressed trying to discover why someone
>> that I do not know and
>> that I have never talked before could do this kind
>> of thing with me..
>>
>> Today someone here wrote telling that there were
>> less messages to rhizome.
>> Another one reply right away telling that it was
>> very good. After this I
>> received the message from Beate with this subject
>> "martin kippenberger has
>> left the building" (I related this with the previous
>> messages - who is not
>> posting here - me), the worse is that she sent this
>> to Rhizome and to
>> another of my emails, I do not belong the list
>> serverfestival@listner.org
>> from where the email was sent, so that it must be
>> sent as bcc. So I imagined
>> that she was very interested that I read that
>> message, and the rest you
>> already know.
>>
>> I am a very sensitive person, to you have an idea,
>> I have stoped to work in
>> my projects since March 23 rd, I do not get to do
>> anything. During three
>> days I was on the bed with the world rotating around
>> me because of my high
>> blood pressure. In fact I can not understand why
>> someone like me that are
>> always working to net.art and announcing other
>> artists and their works, and
>> Art and Culture deserved that kind of feedback from
>> the list.
>>
>> My sincere apologies, but if one of you could tell
>> me what I have done to
>> deserve this, it will be wonderful.
>>
>> To conclude I would like to say that the rhizomers
>> which I sent a copy of
>> the my message to Beate are chosen among my friends
>> or rhizomers that know
>> me there are much time or rhizomers that I think
>> that are vip. I have not
>> against them
>>
>> I hope it should clarify why I am not okay.
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>> Regina
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ryan Griffis" <ryan.griffis@gmail.com>
>> To: "Regina Pinto" <reginapinto@arteonline.arq.br>
>> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 5:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: martin kippenberger
>> has left the building
>>
>>
>> > Hi Regina,
>> > i certainly did not mean my post to be an insult,
>> but after seeing your
>> > response to Beate and remembering your message to
>> Curt and myself earlier
>> > in the week... there seems an odd pattern.
>> > as far as i can tell none of the posts that have
>> attracted your attention
>> > seem to be directed at you in any way whatsoever.
>> so my conclusion is that
>> > your messages are somehow performative and meant
>> to "get at" something
>> > else - to redirect our attention.
>> > if not, i meant my question genuinely: "are you
>> OK?"
>> > it's not really my place to ask, as i don't know
>> you at all... but i
>> > thought a public display of concern was warranted.
>> > at any rate, i have never and will never post
>> anything personal and
>> > malicious on the list, and would certainly never
>> do anything to
>> > purposefully offend or insult you. i don't think
>> many people on rhizome
>> > would either. your posts to rhizome are welcome
>> and interesting. (still
>> > going through some of your links re Lygia Clark,
>> etc)
>> > take care,
>> > ryan
>> >
>> > On Apr 7, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Regina Pinto wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dear Ryan and others,
>> >>
>> >> I did not sent this message to rhizome. I sent it
>> to Beate first and as
>> >> she did not answered fastly and I was really
>> completely astonished I
>> >> sent tosome other rhizomers, but not for you or
>> to the list . It was
>> >> Beate that forward it to rhizome . I have already
>> answered her
>> >> explanation which you can see below. If you or
>> other person need more
>> >> explanation, just tell me.
>> >>
>> >> Thank you Beate, and my apologies to you and
>> other rhizomes. However you
>> >> do not need to send messages to my other email. I
>> am in Rhizome Raw yet.
>> >> I have been really confused since some rhizome
>> members told me that my
>> >> emails were not welcome, just because my outlook
>> software sent a message
>> >> by mistake. I do not think that it is a reason
>> for that and then I became
>> >> to imagine why I received this kind of feedback.
>> Your message reach me in
>> >> this difficult period of my on line life . That
>> is it.
>> >>
>> >> All best,
>> >>
>> >> Regina
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> +
>> -> post: list@rhizome.org
>> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
>> -> subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>> +
>> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set
>> out in the
>> Membership Agreement available online at
>> http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>>
>
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>

Hi Ryan,

No, I am not OK. I am completely up set, that is it. I would never do
anything performative which such horrible them.
The message I sent to you and Curt where sent by the same reason, I want to
discover why people were so agressive with me because my outlook sent a
message by mistake. By the way, I imagine that it was the first time that
someone received a message from mailia here. If you searh the archives of
March 21st, probably you will realize this. I am always looking for any sign
of the reason of this negative feedback in the messages I receive from
rhizome. It is a completely stressing situation. Bu the way, I admire you a
lot, you were the only one to help me that day.

I do not post to rhizome since March 23, that day I sent a message with two
links for you, saying this:

"Thanks for the link Ryan, quite good!
Below two good texts in English by Suely Rolnik about Lygia Clark. There you
will find good information about relational objects, as I have promised."

Imediately someone posted a message:

DO NOT TEST
DO NOT TEST
DO NOT TEST

After this I received that message, I stop to send messages and became
completely stressed trying to discover why someone that I do not know and
that I have never talked before could do this kind of thing with me..

Today someone here wrote telling that there were less messages to rhizome.
Another one reply right away telling that it was very good. After this I
received the message from Beate with this subject "martin kippenberger has
left the building" (I related this with the previous messages - who is not
posting here - me), the worse is that she sent this to Rhizome and to
another of my emails, I do not belong the list serverfestival@listner.org
from where the email was sent, so that it must be sent as bcc. So I imagined
that she was very interested that I read that message, and the rest you
already know.

I am a very sensitive person, to you have an idea, I have stoped to work in
my projects since March 23 rd, I do not get to do anything. During three
days I was on the bed with the world rotating around me because of my high
blood pressure. In fact I can not understand why someone like me that are
always working to net.art and announcing other artists and their works, and
Art and Culture deserved that kind of feedback from the list.

My sincere apologies, but if one of you could tell me what I have done to
deserve this, it will be wonderful.

To conclude I would like to say that the rhizomers which I sent a copy of
the my message to Beate are chosen among my friends or rhizomers that know
me there are much time or rhizomers that I think that are vip. I have not
against them

I hope it should clarify why I am not okay.

Yours,

Regina

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Griffis" <ryan.griffis@gmail.com>
To: "Regina Pinto" <reginapinto@arteonline.arq.br>
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: martin kippenberger has left the building

> Hi Regina,
> i certainly did not mean my post to be an insult, but after seeing your
> response to Beate and remembering your message to Curt and myself earlier
> in the week... there seems an odd pattern.
> as far as i can tell none of the posts that have attracted your attention
> seem to be directed at you in any way whatsoever. so my conclusion is that
> your messages are somehow performative and meant to "get at" something
> else - to redirect our attention.
> if not, i meant my question genuinely: "are you OK?"
> it's not really my place to ask, as i don't know you at all... but i
> thought a public display of concern was warranted.
> at any rate, i have never and will never post anything personal and
> malicious on the list, and would certainly never do anything to
> purposefully offend or insult you. i don't think many people on rhizome
> would either. your posts to rhizome are welcome and interesting. (still
> going through some of your links re Lygia Clark, etc)
> take care,
> ryan
>
> On Apr 7, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Regina Pinto wrote:
>
>> Dear Ryan and others,
>>
>> I did not sent this message to rhizome. I sent it to Beate first and as
>> she did not answered fastly and I was really completely astonished I
>> sent tosome other rhizomers, but not for you or to the list . It was
>> Beate that forward it to rhizome . I have already answered her
>> explanation which you can see below. If you or other person need more
>> explanation, just tell me.
>>
>> Thank you Beate, and my apologies to you and other rhizomes. However you
>> do not need to send messages to my other email. I am in Rhizome Raw yet.
>> I have been really confused since some rhizome members told me that my
>> emails were not welcome, just because my outlook software sent a message
>> by mistake. I do not think that it is a reason for that and then I became
>> to imagine why I received this kind of feedback. Your message reach me in
>> this difficult period of my on line life . That is it.
>>
>> All best,
>>
>> Regina
>
>
>

Dear Ryan and others,

I did not sent this message to rhizome. I sent it to Beate first and as she
did not answered fastly and I was really completely astonished I sent
tosome other rhizomers, but not for you or to the list . It was Beate that
forward it to rhizome . I have already answered her explanation which you
can see below. If you or other person need more explanation, just tell me.

Thank you Beate, and my apologies to you and other rhizomes. However you do
not need to send messages to my other email. I am in Rhizome Raw yet. I have
been really confused since some rhizome members told me that my emails were
not welcome, just because my outlook software sent a message by mistake. I
do not think that it is a reason for that and then I became to imagine why I
received this kind of feedback. Your message reach me in this difficult
period of my on line life . That is it.

All best,

Regina

----- Original Message -----
From: "beate zurwehme" <beate@zurwehme.org>
To: "Regina Pinto" <arteonline@arteonline.arq.br>
Cc: "Pall Thayer" <p_thay@alcor.concordia.ca>; "Lauren Cornell"
<laurencornell@rhizome.org>; "Marisa Olson" <marisa@rhizome.org>; "Alan
Sondheim" <sondheim@gmail.com>; "Jim Andrews" <jim@vispo.com>; "Michael
Szpakowski" <szpako@yahoo.com>; "marc" <marc.garrett@furtherfield.org>;
"Dirk Vekemans" <dv@vilt.net>; "christina mcphee"
<christina112@earthlink.net>; "][catching.22][" <netwurker@hotkey.net.au>
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: martin kippenberger has left the building

>
> hello all,
>
> my intentions are on one side, to refer just to martin himself, and one of
> his most famous paintigs is "ich kann beim besten willen kein hakenkreut
> darauf erkennen", now owned by collector mick flick. i did not realized
> that this work would be totally unknown. on the other side, i want to
> recall this "nazi"-thing. most people, in the art world too, want to
> forget, or nothing to know., they are born later than ww2 ended, and so
> on. i'm 1/8 jewish, and i hate nazis, i hate artists who like to make
> clean art and clean business inside a clean social enmvironment, because
> that will claim that the "nazi geist" is still around us.
>
> thank you.
>
> beate

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Griffis" <ryan.griffis@gmail.com>
To: "rhizome" <list@rhizome.org>
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: martin kippenberger has left the building

> Regina...
> are you OK?
> if this is a performance meant to cause concern about a person i've never
> met except through a list, it has worked.
> are you singling me out for a particular reason? why have i been chosen to
> receive your desperate thoughts?
> am i more guilty than others?
> do not play games with such fragile and serious things. please.
> you must know i care.
> the people running my country are proven criminals and murderers, but i
> cannot say i care more about that than this.
> even my dog has been neglected, since my thoughts have become so
> overwhelmed with this concern.
> i do not know how to be any more direct.
>
> On Apr 7, 2006, at 11:57 AM, beate zurwehme wrote:
>
>> Am 07.04.2006 um 18:22 schrieb Regina Pinto:
>>
>> Dear Beate and all,
>>
>> I visited your work and liked, specially the sound. But...
>>
>> Martin kippenberger is a polemic artist.
>> Also your text: "ich kann beim besten willen kein hakenkreuz darin" = +-
>> "I can recognize with the best sake no swastika therein" has bestirred
>> me.
>> Also the fact that you sent this email to my other email which is not the
>> email I use in rhizome. I do not know you from another list.
>> We have never talked before.
>> Are you trying to tell me anything? I would like to understand why you
>> sent me this work privately.
>> My ancestors were JEWISH if you are interested about this. Please, tell
>> me the truth!
>> It is so absurd that one can imagine this that I am a nazzy that I am
>> completely astonished!
>> My works are not polemic, can you tell me which is the work I did which
>> is polemic?
>> Have you seen any suastic in one of them? Please, tell me! Be sincere!
>> Perhaps the polemic is in your eyes or in the eyes of the one that is
>> spreading this, do you know him /her? Tell me please from whom you
>> received this information.
>> It seems to me that you are accusing me, if you are you doing this, are
>> you based on what? Could you explain me? I do not think that it is
>> ethical, do you?
>> The last evenements in Rizome made me stressed just because I did not
>> know of what I have been acused.
>> I have been sick, with hight blood pressure. Also I am not posting
>> because I do not like to cause problems, mainly if people do not do
>> direct accusations.
>> Please, be direct just like I am being, okay?
>> Let's decide this forever, please!
>>
>> I know who I am and I do not deserve this at all
>>
>> If I am imagining things, my sincere apologies!
>>
>> All best,
>>
>> Regina
>
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>

Thanks for the link Ryan, quite good!
Below two good texts in English by Suely Rolnik about Lygia Clark. There you
will find good information about relational objects, as I have promised.

http://www1.uol.com.br/bienal/24bienal/nuh/inuhclark02a.htm

http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/IFF/for/projekte/kunstprojekt/english/referate/rolnik.htm

best,

Regina

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Griffis" <ryan.griffis@gmail.com>
To: "rhizome" <list@rhizome.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: David Medalla At The Barbican Art Gallery In
London During The "Tropicalia" Exhibition

> Thanks for all that Regina.
> I've got an OK book that includes Clark called The Experimental Exercise
> of Freedom (along with Oiticica, Gego, Goeritz, an Schendel).
> we just ran an interesting article discussing Oiticica in relation to some
> new media ideas...
> http://joaap.org/4/issue4.php?page=botey
> best,
> ryan
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>