Rachel Greene
Since the beginning
Works in New York, Nebraska United States of America

BIO
Rhizome is friends and family for Rachel, who has been involved with the org. in one capacity or another since 1997 when it was rhizome.com!!
Rachel wrote a book on internet art for thames & hudson's well-known WORLD OF ART series: it was published in June 2004. She was a consultant and catalogue author for the 2004 Whitney Biennial. She has also written for publications including frieze, artforum, timeout and bomb.
Discussions (824) Opportunities (20) Events (0) Jobs (0)
DISCUSSION

Re: No Web Art in the Whitney Biennial?


Velvet Strike may have been performance, but it was online performance.
Not sure what line you're making to exclude it but I think it is widely
considered a net-based project. You can look up Anne Marie starting on
opensorcery.net -- she has a pretty amazing body of work.

On Tuesday, November 4, 2003, at 01:33 AM, Eryk Salvaggio wrote:

>
> As if Miranda July wouldn't have been there anyway. Wasn't she born as
> a
> piece for the Whitney Biennial? And Velevet Strike isn't web art, is
> it? Its
> a video game performance piece. I missed Golan Levin in the list and I
> don't
> know who Anne Marie Schleiner is.
>
> -e.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rachel Greene" <rachel@rhizome.org>
> To: "Eryk Salvaggio" <eryk@maine.rr.com>
> Cc: "voyd" <voyd@voyd.com>; <list@rhizome.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:46 PM
> Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: No Web Art in the Whitney Biennial?
>
>
>> Besides Anne-Marie Schleiner, Velvet Strike and Golan Levin's work,
>> another web-based piece in the Biennial is Learning to Love You More
>> by
>> Miranda July and Harrell Fletcher. -- Rachel
>>
>> http://www.learningtoloveyoumore.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, November 2, 2003, at 03:28 PM, Eryk Salvaggio wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Personally I would have nominated myself.
>>>
>>> But really, it's a trend- net.art is, in institutional eyes, over.
>>> Now
>>> it's
>>> Tracy and the Plastics, which is fine by me. I am surprised
>>> Fischerspooner
>>> wasn't included, then we could say there was a real trend toward
>>> synthetic
>>> performance or something, but no such luck. Maybe it's a trendless
>>> year-
>>> maybe American Art needed a break, my guess is that the selection
>>> process
>>> and curator organization this year harmed smaller niche artforms. The
>>> inclusion of dead artists is interesting, too.
>>>
>>> "So what" is a good question; I think it just means everything that
>>> we
>>> already know: It's out of the ghetto, which everyone was fighting so
>>> hard
>>> for, and now it can't afford the property taxes.
>>>
>>> -e.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "voyd" <voyd@voyd.com>
>>> To: <list@rhizome.org>
>>> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 2:14 PM
>>> Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: No Web Art in the Whitney Biennial?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Then, what does this say?
>>>> Does it matter whether any web art is in the WB?
>>>> Does it say that web art is not communicating to curators, does it
>>>> say
>>> that there is not good American web art currently, does it say that
>>> the
>>> istitution has had its dalliance with web art and grown tired...
>>>>
>>>> What does this say?
>>>>
>>>> THat's what I want to know.
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I would have nominated David Crawford.
>>>>
>>>> ---- Eryk Salvaggio <eryk@maine.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Or did I just not recognize any of them? (And no, Cory Arcangel /
>>>>> Velvet
>>> Strike- good folks- are not web artists, they're software artists).
>>>>>
>>>>> -e.
>>>>>
>>>> +
>>>> -> post: list@rhizome.org
>>>> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
>>>> -> subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>> http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>>>> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>>>> -> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is open to non-members
>>>> +
>>>> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>>>> Membership Agreement available online at
>>>> http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>>>>
>>>
>>> +
>>> -> post: list@rhizome.org
>>> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
>>> -> subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>>> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>>> -> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is open to non-members
>>> +
>>> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>>> Membership Agreement available online at
>>> http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>>>
>>
>> +
>> -> post: list@rhizome.org
>> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
>> -> subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>> -> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is open to non-members
>> +
>> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>> Membership Agreement available online at
>> http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>>
>
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> -> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is open to non-members
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>

DISCUSSION

Re: No Web Art in the Whitney Biennial?


Besides Anne-Marie Schleiner, Velvet Strike and Golan Levin's work,
another web-based piece in the Biennial is Learning to Love You More by
Miranda July and Harrell Fletcher. -- Rachel

http://www.learningtoloveyoumore.com

On Sunday, November 2, 2003, at 03:28 PM, Eryk Salvaggio wrote:

>
> Personally I would have nominated myself.
>
> But really, it's a trend- net.art is, in institutional eyes, over. Now
> it's
> Tracy and the Plastics, which is fine by me. I am surprised
> Fischerspooner
> wasn't included, then we could say there was a real trend toward
> synthetic
> performance or something, but no such luck. Maybe it's a trendless
> year-
> maybe American Art needed a break, my guess is that the selection
> process
> and curator organization this year harmed smaller niche artforms. The
> inclusion of dead artists is interesting, too.
>
> "So what" is a good question; I think it just means everything that we
> already know: It's out of the ghetto, which everyone was fighting so
> hard
> for, and now it can't afford the property taxes.
>
> -e.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "voyd" <voyd@voyd.com>
> To: <list@rhizome.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 2:14 PM
> Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: No Web Art in the Whitney Biennial?
>
>
>> Then, what does this say?
>> Does it matter whether any web art is in the WB?
>> Does it say that web art is not communicating to curators, does it say
> that there is not good American web art currently, does it say that the
> istitution has had its dalliance with web art and grown tired...
>>
>> What does this say?
>>
>> THat's what I want to know.
>>
>> Personally, I would have nominated David Crawford.
>>
>> ---- Eryk Salvaggio <eryk@maine.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Or did I just not recognize any of them? (And no, Cory Arcangel /
>>> Velvet
> Strike- good folks- are not web artists, they're software artists).
>>>
>>> -e.
>>>
>> +
>> -> post: list@rhizome.org
>> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
>> -> subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>> -> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is open to non-members
>> +
>> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>> Membership Agreement available online at
>> http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>>
>
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> -> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is open to non-members
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>

DISCUSSION

Fwd: An on/off line net.art exhibition on cyberfeminism


Begin forwarded message:

> From: "2-red" <info@2-red.net>
> Date: Sun Nov 2, 2003 5:40:31 PM US/Eastern
> To: rachel@rhizome.org
> Subject: An on/off line net.art exhibition on cyberfeminism
>
> HABITAR EN (PUNTO) NET
>
> www.2-red.net/habitar/
>
> An on/off line net.art exhibition on cyberfeminism.
>
> Organized by Espai F.

DISCUSSION

Alternative Economics, Alternative Societies at Galerija Skuc, Ljubljana


--Apple-Mail-13--873262130
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed

>

--Apple-Mail-13--873262130
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/enriched;
charset=US-ASCII

<excerpt><color><param>4444,4444,4444</param>

</color></excerpt>
--Apple-Mail-13--873262130--

DISCUSSION

Net Art News Poll Results


Hi -- Recently we polled readers of Net Art News to see how frequently
they wanted to receive the mailing.

Out of 426 votes, 51% or 218 votes indicated that they preferred to
read Net Art News 3 X per week.
15% or 66 people said they preferred 5 days per week,
and one third (33%), 142 votes said that either 3 or 5 days per week
was fine.

Looks like for now, 3 days per week it is! -- Rachel


CURATED EXHIBITIONS (1)