PORTFOLIO (1)
Re: Hacktivists or Cyberterrorists?
on 10/12/02 1:28 PM, + lo_y. + at loy@myrealbox.com wrote:
> ( " seems like you're confusing hackers with crackers " )
>
> ( " fuck all humanz " )
>
> ( " i have been bitten by one " )
>
No I have not confused anything, and your comparison with humans (or humanZ,
whatever they are) is preposterous. Care to elaborate?
m
> ( " seems like you're confusing hackers with crackers " )
>
> ( " fuck all humanz " )
>
> ( " i have been bitten by one " )
>
No I have not confused anything, and your comparison with humans (or humanZ,
whatever they are) is preposterous. Care to elaborate?
m
Re: Hacktivists or Cyberterrorists?
on 10/11/02 7:45 AM, rdom@THING.NET at rdom@THING.NET wrote:
> Hacktivists or Cyberterrorists?
>
> The Changing Media Discourse on Hacking by Sandor Vegh
>
> This paper scrutinizes the language of government reports and news media
> sources to shed light on their role in forming a negative image of politically
> motivated hacking in general, and online political activism, in particular. It
> is argued that the mass media's portrayal of hacking conveniently fits the
> elite's strategy to form a popular consensus in a way that supports the
> elite's
> crusade under different pretexts to eradicate hacking, an activity that may
> potentially threaten the dominant order.
>
> http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_10/vegh/
>
> REMEMBER TO JOIN THE ACTION TOMMORROW!!!
> Oct 12, 2002 9am to Oct 14th 12pm.
>
> http://www.thing.net/~rdom/ecd/ecd.html
>
> Zapta Vive!
>
> Live and in Color from Poland.
>
> over and outl,
> ricardo
> + tripe
>
Fuck all hackers! They are engaged in totally malicious behavior that is
utterly devoid of value to anybody. If you think it is fun to glamorize
these scumsucking bums, just wait until you lose a few bucks to them because
of a disabled server or something, and then you will change your mind. As
for them having any kind of political consciousness, what a joke! They
destroy people's lives, good and bad alike, simply because it gets them off.
Fuck all hackers! They are worse than masturbating fleas!
I write this not as part of any elite or politically reactionary force in
society, but because I was the innocent victim of one of these shits. Fuck
all hackers, fuck them all!
m
> Hacktivists or Cyberterrorists?
>
> The Changing Media Discourse on Hacking by Sandor Vegh
>
> This paper scrutinizes the language of government reports and news media
> sources to shed light on their role in forming a negative image of politically
> motivated hacking in general, and online political activism, in particular. It
> is argued that the mass media's portrayal of hacking conveniently fits the
> elite's strategy to form a popular consensus in a way that supports the
> elite's
> crusade under different pretexts to eradicate hacking, an activity that may
> potentially threaten the dominant order.
>
> http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_10/vegh/
>
> REMEMBER TO JOIN THE ACTION TOMMORROW!!!
> Oct 12, 2002 9am to Oct 14th 12pm.
>
> http://www.thing.net/~rdom/ecd/ecd.html
>
> Zapta Vive!
>
> Live and in Color from Poland.
>
> over and outl,
> ricardo
> + tripe
>
Fuck all hackers! They are engaged in totally malicious behavior that is
utterly devoid of value to anybody. If you think it is fun to glamorize
these scumsucking bums, just wait until you lose a few bucks to them because
of a disabled server or something, and then you will change your mind. As
for them having any kind of political consciousness, what a joke! They
destroy people's lives, good and bad alike, simply because it gets them off.
Fuck all hackers! They are worse than masturbating fleas!
I write this not as part of any elite or politically reactionary force in
society, but because I was the innocent victim of one of these shits. Fuck
all hackers, fuck them all!
m
Re: Re: more questions
on 10/9/02 5:55 PM, Lewis LaCook at llacook@yahoo.com wrote:
> i often get short with works that are passive, or offer the user very little
> in terms of collaboration===such works are often beautiful, but i always go
> away from them wondering why they're on the net as opposed to in a gallery or
> on a film screen...but i'm a bit of a "purist" that way====
But with all due respect, senor LLaCook, how do you bring such a point of
view into sync with your posting of 1-2 highly "passive" (by your standards,
not mine) poems per day to this list and others? Not that I don't think them
beautiful (by both our standards, I suspect). . .
-m
> i often get short with works that are passive, or offer the user very little
> in terms of collaboration===such works are often beautiful, but i always go
> away from them wondering why they're on the net as opposed to in a gallery or
> on a film screen...but i'm a bit of a "purist" that way====
But with all due respect, senor LLaCook, how do you bring such a point of
view into sync with your posting of 1-2 highly "passive" (by your standards,
not mine) poems per day to this list and others? Not that I don't think them
beautiful (by both our standards, I suspect). . .
-m
RHIZOME_RAW: ASCII and ye shall RECEIVESCII ! 2
The color version (550K file!) :
[http://www.aroseisaroseisarose.com/092002jpgs/DD2Ascii de-registered.jpg]
-m
[http://www.aroseisaroseisarose.com/092002jpgs/DD2Ascii de-registered.jpg]
-m
RHIZOME_RAW: ASCII and ye shall RECEIVESCII !
ASCII and ye shall RECEIVESCII !
[http://www.aroseisaroseisarose.com/092002jpgs/DD2AsciiB&W.gif]
-m
[http://www.aroseisaroseisarose.com/092002jpgs/DD2AsciiB&W.gif]
-m