ARTBASE (1)
PORTFOLIO (3)
BIO
Marc Garrett is co-director and co-founder, with artist Ruth Catlow of the Internet arts collectives and communities – Furtherfield.org, Furthernoise.org, Netbehaviour.org, also co-founder and co-curator/director of the gallery space formerly known as 'HTTP Gallery' now called the Furtherfield Gallery in London (Finsbury Park), UK. Co-curating various contemporary Media Arts exhibitions, projects nationally and internationally. Co-editor of 'Artists Re:Thinking Games' with Ruth Catlow and Corrado Morgana 2010. Hosted Furtherfield's critically acclaimed weekly broadcast on UK's Resonance FM Radio, a series of hour long live interviews with people working at the edge of contemporary practices in art, technology & social change. Currently doing an Art history Phd at the University of London, Birkbeck College.
Net artist, media artist, curator, writer, street artist, activist, educationalist and musician. Emerging in the late 80′s from the streets exploring creativity via agit-art tactics. Using unofficial, experimental platforms such as the streets, pirate radio such as the locally popular ‘Savage Yet Tender’ alternative broadcasting 1980′s group, net broadcasts, BBS systems, performance, intervention, events, pamphlets, warehouses and gallery spaces. In the early nineties, was co-sysop (systems operator) with Heath Bunting on Cybercafe BBS with Irational.org.
Our mission is to co-create extraordinary art that connects with contemporary audiences providing innovative, engaging and inclusive digital and physical spaces for appreciating and participating in practices in art, technology and social change. As well as finding alternative ways around already dominating hegemonies, thus claiming for ourselves and our peer networks a culturally aware and critical dialogue beyond traditional hierarchical behaviours. Influenced by situationist theory, fluxus, free and open source culture, and processes of self-education and peer learning, in an art, activist and community context.
Net artist, media artist, curator, writer, street artist, activist, educationalist and musician. Emerging in the late 80′s from the streets exploring creativity via agit-art tactics. Using unofficial, experimental platforms such as the streets, pirate radio such as the locally popular ‘Savage Yet Tender’ alternative broadcasting 1980′s group, net broadcasts, BBS systems, performance, intervention, events, pamphlets, warehouses and gallery spaces. In the early nineties, was co-sysop (systems operator) with Heath Bunting on Cybercafe BBS with Irational.org.
Our mission is to co-create extraordinary art that connects with contemporary audiences providing innovative, engaging and inclusive digital and physical spaces for appreciating and participating in practices in art, technology and social change. As well as finding alternative ways around already dominating hegemonies, thus claiming for ourselves and our peer networks a culturally aware and critical dialogue beyond traditional hierarchical behaviours. Influenced by situationist theory, fluxus, free and open source culture, and processes of self-education and peer learning, in an art, activist and community context.
wars among thieves
------=_NextPart_001_004A_01C2B012.23DED060
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Blank "All wars are wars among thieves who are too cowardly to fight and who
therefore induce the young manhood of the whole world to do the fighting
for them."
-Emma Goldman
------=_NextPart_001_004A_01C2B012.23DED060
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE id=ridTitle>Blank</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-125=
2"><BASE
href="file://C:Program FilesCommon FilesMicrosoft SharedStationery">
<STYLE>BODY {
MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 25px; COLOR: #000000; FONT=
-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica
}
P.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; FONT-F=
AMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
LI.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; FONT-F=
AMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=ridBody bgColor=#ffffff
background=cid:004801c2b012$23dc5f60$0100a8c0@FURTHERFIELD>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> "All wars are wars among=
thieves
who are too cowardly to fight and who<BR>therefore induce the young manhood=
of
the whole world to do the fighting<BR>for them."<BR><BR> -Emma
Goldman</FONT> </DIV>
<P><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </P></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_001_004A_01C2B012.23DED060--
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Blank "All wars are wars among thieves who are too cowardly to fight and who
therefore induce the young manhood of the whole world to do the fighting
for them."
-Emma Goldman
------=_NextPart_001_004A_01C2B012.23DED060
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE id=ridTitle>Blank</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-125=
2"><BASE
href="file://C:Program FilesCommon FilesMicrosoft SharedStationery">
<STYLE>BODY {
MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 25px; COLOR: #000000; FONT=
-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica
}
P.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; FONT-F=
AMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
LI.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; FONT-F=
AMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=ridBody bgColor=#ffffff
background=cid:004801c2b012$23dc5f60$0100a8c0@FURTHERFIELD>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> "All wars are wars among=
thieves
who are too cowardly to fight and who<BR>therefore induce the young manhood=
of
the whole world to do the fighting<BR>for them."<BR><BR> -Emma
Goldman</FONT> </DIV>
<P><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </P></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_001_004A_01C2B012.23DED060--
Re: R.Ryman for beginners
>It ain't Robert Ryman without the hanging hardware
Very true christopher,
but what if we are part of the hanging hardware?
marc
> >
> >
> > IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
> > etc.
>
> It ain't Robert Ryman without the hanging hardware. Ryman is all about
> the brackets, the cantilever, the apparatus. :)
>
> -Cf
>
>
> [christopher eli fahey]
> art: http://www.graphpaper.com
> sci: http://www.askrom.com
> biz: http://www.behaviordesign.com
>
>
>
> + ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>
Very true christopher,
but what if we are part of the hanging hardware?
marc
> >
> >
> > IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
> > etc.
>
> It ain't Robert Ryman without the hanging hardware. Ryman is all about
> the brackets, the cantilever, the apparatus. :)
>
> -Cf
>
>
> [christopher eli fahey]
> art: http://www.graphpaper.com
> sci: http://www.askrom.com
> biz: http://www.behaviordesign.com
>
>
>
> + ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>
Re: confusion is sex [richard_feynman remix]
Thanx for that Curt - my own universa' 'confusion is the highest state of
being'
Nice to hear about R.P.Feynman - one of my faves. Concidentally I am
currently reading 'QED', a stonker of a book. Fluid, alive, awake - moving
on, humane. Love it!
Q: Are you drawn to Particles or to waves?
much repsect - marc
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: confusion is sex [richard_feynman remix]
> the most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. it is
> the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and
> true science. whoever does not know it can no longer wonder, no
> longer marvel, is as good as dead, and his eyes are dimmed.
> - albert (1954)
>
> http://web.utk.edu/~blyons/spelvin.html
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> squeeze me
> come on and squeeze me
> come on and tease me like you do
> i'm so in love with you
> - mama (1975)
>
> http://www.thewho.net/whotabs/squeezebox.txt
>
> _
> _
> _
> + ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>
being'
Nice to hear about R.P.Feynman - one of my faves. Concidentally I am
currently reading 'QED', a stonker of a book. Fluid, alive, awake - moving
on, humane. Love it!
Q: Are you drawn to Particles or to waves?
much repsect - marc
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: confusion is sex [richard_feynman remix]
> the most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. it is
> the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and
> true science. whoever does not know it can no longer wonder, no
> longer marvel, is as good as dead, and his eyes are dimmed.
> - albert (1954)
>
> http://web.utk.edu/~blyons/spelvin.html
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> squeeze me
> come on and squeeze me
> come on and tease me like you do
> i'm so in love with you
> - mama (1975)
>
> http://www.thewho.net/whotabs/squeezebox.txt
>
> _
> _
> _
> + ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>
Karei & Neosim
Karei & Neoism.
Your insistent function reminds me of some of my 'neoist' friends in the UK.
In fact percieved alienation seems to be part of the acquired make-up,
changing whatever is discussed or said by others on its head. Language is
the medium and where ever there is cohesive communication amongst others, or
the act of it, is fertile ground for disruption via Neoist rules-principles.
A conscious act of dismantling distinction is part of the
intellectual-isolatory
game, and it is a competitive activity or sport with rules that others are
not supposed to be aware of, or the actual purity of it will not work as
well as intended.
The 'Neoist', acts like a mason, a secret agent, who has vowed never to
declare who they are, for that breaks the whole position and power ratio
down. It would weaken the power of this consciously post-realization
collective, compromising its (very active) position to disrupt. It is mainly
a male dominated sect, harboring the likes of 'Stuart Home' a real person,
and there are invented names also such as 'Monty Catsin', 'Karen Elliot' &
loads more. Although 'Maris Kundzins', a Lithuanian puppet player (of
course, more interested with playing with real people instead) was I believe
one of the originators of Neoism. Although 'Karei', can correct me on this
one. Are you Maris? I know, it is a secret.
Neosim is a contrary thing, it seems to resolve contradictions by
reinforcing them, and pertaining the golden rule of putting personal agendas
aside. Even though the act of putting personal agendas aside does come from
being in an emotional state, it is also 'literally' irrational, yet
objective. It is relational yet not part of the stream of (assumed)
consciousness that we might consider ourselves sharing. The Neoist is
seperate, an alien, deliberately; defying the urge to get personally
involved with anyone (even if they like them) on a list such as this, if
they did, they would break the golden rule.
A structuralist function, using generative actions & and an objective tool
that anyone can use, as long as they stick to the rules of not telling
anyone. For instance Rhizome and their crew, or at least, some of them; I am
sure know about this, hence their hesitant reaction to 'Karei's' actions on
the list. So that means that Rhizome also know personally, some 'neoists'.
Being a Neoist, is probably the most underground state of being on the
planet, because it never gets assimilated into the mediated haze, an
impressive thing really. Lists are a perfect place for such activity to
flourish, or propogate, for it is text based and relies on the users, to use
language.
For someone like 'Karei', who seems to use Neoist rules, text and identity
are the same thing, it has no identity. There is a real person there, typing
but they do not allow themselves to break the stream of un-conscious
deliberations. A Neoist can change their invented persona to personas, as
did 'Karei'. There is no such thing as truth, only the function, and that is
part of the basis of their deconstruction, which can be the closest to a
'Neoist's' truth; if there is such a thing. Yet that would not be declared
of course. For part of the non reasoning or intention is to not get caught
up in psychology (its personalization) mutualist environments. Not believing
in specific commonly-held opinions, such as the value of capitalist social
relations, or belief in metaphysical abstractions, or anything anyone might
possibly agree on is all part of the entities action. A play with dialect,
which is termed as 'dialectical immaterialism'.
The Neoist tool is not really about communication, in fact the process of
clashing with commuincation seems to stunt it, causing confusion; which has
its own qualities but also can possess negativities at the same time. Which
is of no concern to a Neoist, by default. A Neoist usually does not judge,
merely (although Karei seems to break that rule) just acts. 'Karei', knows
that what is not said, is just as important as what is said, if one bothers
to stroll through past threads in relation to 'Karei's' way of using
language; you begin to realize that similarities do crop up. Certain
repetitive txt based responses do occur; this not because 'Karei' is stupid
by any stretch of the imagination, it is because, as a Neoist, there are
certain rules that must be put in place. An opposite to what has been
mentioned, such as in the case of Joseph and Karei. Karei does not hate
Joseph, but must create friction, that is the whole point, comply to the
rules accordingly, hence contrarily.
The only enemy of a Neoist is their own ego, and everyone else's. By the
way, the term Neoist was not created by the original Neoist suppozedly, in
fact they say that their enemies created the name; yet at the same time they
are their own enemies. Are you getting the drift at all now?
The Neoist believes that Art is a false idol, a misrepresentation of space,
in fact it is seen as a form of propaganda. Artists, or rather their
artistic contributions are consumerized fodder, made for the capitalist
machine to gulp; it is eaten and then spat out as waste, till the monster of
capitalism chooses its next meal. And there are plenty out there for it to
eat. The Neoist respects artists grudgingly but holds contempt for their
ever increasingly desire to be known, and how they prostitute themselves to
get where they feel they are supposed to be. Also, a Neoist would feel that
I was actually becoming one of them, just by thinking on their terms. May be
I already am to some degree - yet I have never had a term or word for such
feelings.
'To produce art in a strictly formal way. Refine it to a craft of technical,
aesthetic and mathematical precision. The old cliche of art for art's sake,
and why not? The problem only occurs when the structure of society detaches
the by-product of an individual period of creativity, maybe with the
artist's connivance, and institutes it as a sterile husk, a coinage.' This
statement is a good example of a term that I myself would use, in respect of
'coinage', I would use currency, it means the same in the context of
culturalization of creativity, sucked in by institutional systems.
I would rather that Art (which is such a small word) was so everyday that
institutional dominance decided that there was no control value in it. Thus,
it is reclaimed via the process of merely expounding our imaginings as
something we declare and share, rather than imposed via already tired
'art-run' insitutionally linear structures. The act of imagining is a
freedom that is too readily ignored by many, art does not have to always be
out there; it can be part of everything and exist without that 'self
cosciously' dictated label called 'art', that is where its potential freedom
lies. To have freedom is not know that you've got it.
My own personal decision is to always keep a political stance within my
imaginative 'squeak's, as part of my action and shaky reasoning, this keeps
me grounded; yet this would never rest within the rules of a Neoist. Because
they would say that I am still playing with the same rules, someone else's
thus not being realistic. Yet my own illusion, is my decision, whatever
rules one was to impose or suggest; I am one of those entities who learn by
experience and not just by other people's writings, for I believe that no
one can understand what exactly I am or what I want to be; and who cares
anyway? No one. So to invest in an alternative consciousness would
disintegrate my emotional and intuitive state and sensibilities. Much like
when one unfurls their identity in an institution for learning, throw away
the individual's gunk and replace it with a new skin; educational
environments act by this process; this I have always been suspicious of.
So, this is now the best place to stop - hope those who were not aware are
more aware; and those who dared not declare will now declare...
respect to all - marc
Your insistent function reminds me of some of my 'neoist' friends in the UK.
In fact percieved alienation seems to be part of the acquired make-up,
changing whatever is discussed or said by others on its head. Language is
the medium and where ever there is cohesive communication amongst others, or
the act of it, is fertile ground for disruption via Neoist rules-principles.
A conscious act of dismantling distinction is part of the
intellectual-isolatory
game, and it is a competitive activity or sport with rules that others are
not supposed to be aware of, or the actual purity of it will not work as
well as intended.
The 'Neoist', acts like a mason, a secret agent, who has vowed never to
declare who they are, for that breaks the whole position and power ratio
down. It would weaken the power of this consciously post-realization
collective, compromising its (very active) position to disrupt. It is mainly
a male dominated sect, harboring the likes of 'Stuart Home' a real person,
and there are invented names also such as 'Monty Catsin', 'Karen Elliot' &
loads more. Although 'Maris Kundzins', a Lithuanian puppet player (of
course, more interested with playing with real people instead) was I believe
one of the originators of Neoism. Although 'Karei', can correct me on this
one. Are you Maris? I know, it is a secret.
Neosim is a contrary thing, it seems to resolve contradictions by
reinforcing them, and pertaining the golden rule of putting personal agendas
aside. Even though the act of putting personal agendas aside does come from
being in an emotional state, it is also 'literally' irrational, yet
objective. It is relational yet not part of the stream of (assumed)
consciousness that we might consider ourselves sharing. The Neoist is
seperate, an alien, deliberately; defying the urge to get personally
involved with anyone (even if they like them) on a list such as this, if
they did, they would break the golden rule.
A structuralist function, using generative actions & and an objective tool
that anyone can use, as long as they stick to the rules of not telling
anyone. For instance Rhizome and their crew, or at least, some of them; I am
sure know about this, hence their hesitant reaction to 'Karei's' actions on
the list. So that means that Rhizome also know personally, some 'neoists'.
Being a Neoist, is probably the most underground state of being on the
planet, because it never gets assimilated into the mediated haze, an
impressive thing really. Lists are a perfect place for such activity to
flourish, or propogate, for it is text based and relies on the users, to use
language.
For someone like 'Karei', who seems to use Neoist rules, text and identity
are the same thing, it has no identity. There is a real person there, typing
but they do not allow themselves to break the stream of un-conscious
deliberations. A Neoist can change their invented persona to personas, as
did 'Karei'. There is no such thing as truth, only the function, and that is
part of the basis of their deconstruction, which can be the closest to a
'Neoist's' truth; if there is such a thing. Yet that would not be declared
of course. For part of the non reasoning or intention is to not get caught
up in psychology (its personalization) mutualist environments. Not believing
in specific commonly-held opinions, such as the value of capitalist social
relations, or belief in metaphysical abstractions, or anything anyone might
possibly agree on is all part of the entities action. A play with dialect,
which is termed as 'dialectical immaterialism'.
The Neoist tool is not really about communication, in fact the process of
clashing with commuincation seems to stunt it, causing confusion; which has
its own qualities but also can possess negativities at the same time. Which
is of no concern to a Neoist, by default. A Neoist usually does not judge,
merely (although Karei seems to break that rule) just acts. 'Karei', knows
that what is not said, is just as important as what is said, if one bothers
to stroll through past threads in relation to 'Karei's' way of using
language; you begin to realize that similarities do crop up. Certain
repetitive txt based responses do occur; this not because 'Karei' is stupid
by any stretch of the imagination, it is because, as a Neoist, there are
certain rules that must be put in place. An opposite to what has been
mentioned, such as in the case of Joseph and Karei. Karei does not hate
Joseph, but must create friction, that is the whole point, comply to the
rules accordingly, hence contrarily.
The only enemy of a Neoist is their own ego, and everyone else's. By the
way, the term Neoist was not created by the original Neoist suppozedly, in
fact they say that their enemies created the name; yet at the same time they
are their own enemies. Are you getting the drift at all now?
The Neoist believes that Art is a false idol, a misrepresentation of space,
in fact it is seen as a form of propaganda. Artists, or rather their
artistic contributions are consumerized fodder, made for the capitalist
machine to gulp; it is eaten and then spat out as waste, till the monster of
capitalism chooses its next meal. And there are plenty out there for it to
eat. The Neoist respects artists grudgingly but holds contempt for their
ever increasingly desire to be known, and how they prostitute themselves to
get where they feel they are supposed to be. Also, a Neoist would feel that
I was actually becoming one of them, just by thinking on their terms. May be
I already am to some degree - yet I have never had a term or word for such
feelings.
'To produce art in a strictly formal way. Refine it to a craft of technical,
aesthetic and mathematical precision. The old cliche of art for art's sake,
and why not? The problem only occurs when the structure of society detaches
the by-product of an individual period of creativity, maybe with the
artist's connivance, and institutes it as a sterile husk, a coinage.' This
statement is a good example of a term that I myself would use, in respect of
'coinage', I would use currency, it means the same in the context of
culturalization of creativity, sucked in by institutional systems.
I would rather that Art (which is such a small word) was so everyday that
institutional dominance decided that there was no control value in it. Thus,
it is reclaimed via the process of merely expounding our imaginings as
something we declare and share, rather than imposed via already tired
'art-run' insitutionally linear structures. The act of imagining is a
freedom that is too readily ignored by many, art does not have to always be
out there; it can be part of everything and exist without that 'self
cosciously' dictated label called 'art', that is where its potential freedom
lies. To have freedom is not know that you've got it.
My own personal decision is to always keep a political stance within my
imaginative 'squeak's, as part of my action and shaky reasoning, this keeps
me grounded; yet this would never rest within the rules of a Neoist. Because
they would say that I am still playing with the same rules, someone else's
thus not being realistic. Yet my own illusion, is my decision, whatever
rules one was to impose or suggest; I am one of those entities who learn by
experience and not just by other people's writings, for I believe that no
one can understand what exactly I am or what I want to be; and who cares
anyway? No one. So to invest in an alternative consciousness would
disintegrate my emotional and intuitive state and sensibilities. Much like
when one unfurls their identity in an institution for learning, throw away
the individual's gunk and replace it with a new skin; educational
environments act by this process; this I have always been suspicious of.
So, this is now the best place to stop - hope those who were not aware are
more aware; and those who dared not declare will now declare...
respect to all - marc
Re: To Bush
Hi Kitten :-)
I used to die everyday, but now I die twice a day. Have died much lately?
marc
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, marc.garrett wrote:
>
> > To Civilian Killerz
>
> Like yourself?
>
> > Truth will come to light; murder cannot be hid long
>
> Ah. Are you the infamous Aunt Polly?
>
>
>
> + ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>
I used to die everyday, but now I die twice a day. Have died much lately?
marc
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, marc.garrett wrote:
>
> > To Civilian Killerz
>
> Like yourself?
>
> > Truth will come to light; murder cannot be hid long
>
> Ah. Are you the infamous Aunt Polly?
>
>
>
> + ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>