ARTBASE (1)
BIO
Belgrade artists Marija Vauda and Nikola Pilipovic have been
collaborating as MANIK since 1999.Their work reflects the
march of history, sometimes literally outside their studio, and a
dialogue with the international artistic community through
organisations and events such as Rhizome and Free Manifesta. Tiija is
their first weblog piece, their previous work has been in mediums as
diverse as video, performance, happenings, email, painting and
installation.
collaborating as MANIK since 1999.Their work reflects the
march of history, sometimes literally outside their studio, and a
dialogue with the international artistic community through
organisations and events such as Rhizome and Free Manifesta. Tiija is
their first weblog piece, their previous work has been in mediums as
diverse as video, performance, happenings, email, painting and
installation.
Re: J.KOSHUT ABOUT MANIK'S NEW WORK-so im interested
hello, so im interested.
i have a short experimental video 3 minute length
What is SVEN?
MARC GARRETT INVITE MANIK TO LONDON/JUNE 2006.
INSPIRED BY J.KOSHUT TEXT ABOUT MANIK'S WORK MARC WROTE:
"MANIK'S WORKS CONSTRUCT ROMANTIC,MELANCHOLY,AND OTHERWISE RICHLY
DRAMATIC NARRATIVES
ABOUT PAST,PRESENT,AND FUTURE OF INDIVIDUALS INTERSUBJECTIVE
RELATIONSHIP."
Date : 23-06-2006 15:03-Re: RHIZOME_RAW: J.KOSHUT ABOUT MANIK'S NEW WORK
Marc wrote :
Hi Manik,
I think that this is a fine idea - a few people from belgrade, serbia
have been involved in Node.London and also visited the various
Nodes/venues that were part of the Season in March.
It seems to me that there are a few like minded people from belgrade,
serbia who are interested in similar media related proejcts but are not
connected yet - is there an online platform/forum where such seaside
frequenters can meet, or physical a venue even?
marc
i have a short experimental video 3 minute length
What is SVEN?
MARC GARRETT INVITE MANIK TO LONDON/JUNE 2006.
INSPIRED BY J.KOSHUT TEXT ABOUT MANIK'S WORK MARC WROTE:
"MANIK'S WORKS CONSTRUCT ROMANTIC,MELANCHOLY,AND OTHERWISE RICHLY
DRAMATIC NARRATIVES
ABOUT PAST,PRESENT,AND FUTURE OF INDIVIDUALS INTERSUBJECTIVE
RELATIONSHIP."
Date : 23-06-2006 15:03-Re: RHIZOME_RAW: J.KOSHUT ABOUT MANIK'S NEW WORK
Marc wrote :
Hi Manik,
I think that this is a fine idea - a few people from belgrade, serbia
have been involved in Node.London and also visited the various
Nodes/venues that were part of the Season in March.
It seems to me that there are a few like minded people from belgrade,
serbia who are interested in similar media related proejcts but are not
connected yet - is there an online platform/forum where such seaside
frequenters can meet, or physical a venue even?
marc
J.KOSHUT ABOUT MANIK'S NEW WORK
2
"MANIK'S WORKS CONSTRUCT ROMANTIC,MELANCHOLY,AND OTHERWISE RICHLY
DRAMATIC NARRATIVES
ABOUT PAST,PRESENT,AND FUTURE OF INDIVIDUALS INTERSUBJECTIVE
RELATIONSHIP."
text
J.KOSHUT ABOUT MANIK'S NEW WORK,
VIA:http://www.digicult.it/index_eng.htm
on a similar if someone smaller track, if there are any subscribers on the
list who live in belgrade, serbia,i'd appreciate it if they could get in
contact with me. that's where i am and i'm wondering whether might be
profitable for people round here with similar interests to get in contact.
Information:scott@barcodeart.com
MANIK,BELGRADE,JUNE 2006
"MANIK'S WORKS CONSTRUCT ROMANTIC,MELANCHOLY,AND OTHERWISE RICHLY
DRAMATIC NARRATIVES
ABOUT PAST,PRESENT,AND FUTURE OF INDIVIDUALS INTERSUBJECTIVE
RELATIONSHIP."
text
J.KOSHUT ABOUT MANIK'S NEW WORK,
VIA:http://www.digicult.it/index_eng.htm
on a similar if someone smaller track, if there are any subscribers on the
list who live in belgrade, serbia,i'd appreciate it if they could get in
contact with me. that's where i am and i'm wondering whether might be
profitable for people round here with similar interests to get in contact.
Information:scott@barcodeart.com
MANIK,BELGRADE,JUNE 2006
CINDY SHERMAN ABOUT MANIK'S LAST WORK
MANIK'S WORKS CONSTRUCT ROMANTIC,MELANCHOLY,AND OTHERWISE RICHLY
DRAMATIC NARRATIVES
ABOUT PAST,PRESENT,AND FUTURE OF INDIVIDUALS INTERSUBJECTIVE
RELATIONSHIP."
http://flickr.com/photos/frankonyc/34825033/
Cindy Sherman about MANIK'S last work.
Belgrade
June,2006.
DRAMATIC NARRATIVES
ABOUT PAST,PRESENT,AND FUTURE OF INDIVIDUALS INTERSUBJECTIVE
RELATIONSHIP."
http://flickr.com/photos/frankonyc/34825033/
Cindy Sherman about MANIK'S last work.
Belgrade
June,2006.
Re: Re: J.KOONS ABOUT MANIK'S NEW WORKS
> On 17 Jun 2006, at 14:53, manik wrote:
>
> > "MANIK'S WORKS CONSTRUCT ROMANTIC,MELANCHOLY,AND OTHERWISE RICHLY
> > DRAMATIC NARRATIVES
> > ABOUT PAST,PRESENT,AND FUTURE OF INDIVIDUALS INTERSUBJECTIVE
> > RELATIONSHIP."
> >
> > J.KOONS ABOUT MANIK'S NEW
>
> > WORKS,JUNE 2006.
>
18-06-2006 06:18 Eric Dymond wrote:
>I don't know Rob, the Virilio metaphor is a stretch.
MANIK:I don't know Eric,losing chastity is a stretch.
>Virilio endorses Karlheinz Stockhausen's claim that the 911 suicides were =
tragic works of art on a global scale, >engaging the instant media with ima=
ges that will forever be burned into the collective memory. He even states =
that >the panic created can be seen as a development and extension of the A=
ustrian Self Mutilationists of the 70's.
MANIK:Could you give us your own interpretation of 911?We don't understand =
your view trough veil of Virilio/Stockhausen glasses.So...what if "Virilio =
endorses Karlheinz Stockhausen's claim that the 911 suicides were tragic wo=
rks of art..."?Is there some trace you could find non-consistenncy?Is someb=
ody's opservation wrong by default if you couldn't find confirmation of you=
r own insight in matter?
> I doubt that he would support someone as bland, and corporate as Koons.
MANIK:We shouldn't take your suspicion serious,actualy we don't care for th=
em .As mature man you should take care about your words.
>You can't get here from there without some danger in a world bathed in ima=
gery. How can Koons be so comfortable?
>Interventionists like CAE seem far more engaging, and relevant.
MANIK:Rob already explained "how can Koons be so comfortable",and why he c=
an be "so comfortable".(What do you think,he wrote to kill some time?)
It's just double transformation you obvious can't falow.
>He isn't endorsing the act, just illuminating the tragedy.
MANIK:Who of them?
>I honestly can't look at Koons, or many other artists from the 80's and 9=
0's the same way after 911.
MANIK:Isn't it your problem?We could(perhaps) talk about completely differe=
nt aproach to aesthetic substance between you and MANIK/Rob,but what you ca=
n,or can not look...
We are not interested in your private daydreams.We are unpleasant suprised =
with your mail,so what?
If you still think that fact that you are American excuse your superficial,=
or just mentioned of 911 provoke
empathy and all kind of question in every single soul on the world...you ar=
e wrong.
>Until this is somehow concluded, and I have no idea how it will be met and=
assimilated, we are still in the same state >we were 4 1/2 years ago.
MANIK:Who is in same state?MANIK already explain in his article directed to=
Manovich(via Rhizom_Raw,Saturday, December 10, 2005 4:08 AM)what he think =
about "WE" and have no need to repeat that for this occasion.Essence's that
when you said "we"that assume much more than we(MANIK)said same word.So "we=
"don't acept your "we"in sense you mean, when you said "we"...
There's joke about Serb in Sweden.He wrote home:"They stay behind us twenty=
years.In Sweden is stil good life."
And,finaly,kind gesture of J.Koons who agree to wrote few words about our w=
ork show his good upbringing.
MANIK
>
> > "MANIK'S WORKS CONSTRUCT ROMANTIC,MELANCHOLY,AND OTHERWISE RICHLY
> > DRAMATIC NARRATIVES
> > ABOUT PAST,PRESENT,AND FUTURE OF INDIVIDUALS INTERSUBJECTIVE
> > RELATIONSHIP."
> >
> > J.KOONS ABOUT MANIK'S NEW
>
> > WORKS,JUNE 2006.
>
18-06-2006 06:18 Eric Dymond wrote:
>I don't know Rob, the Virilio metaphor is a stretch.
MANIK:I don't know Eric,losing chastity is a stretch.
>Virilio endorses Karlheinz Stockhausen's claim that the 911 suicides were =
tragic works of art on a global scale, >engaging the instant media with ima=
ges that will forever be burned into the collective memory. He even states =
that >the panic created can be seen as a development and extension of the A=
ustrian Self Mutilationists of the 70's.
MANIK:Could you give us your own interpretation of 911?We don't understand =
your view trough veil of Virilio/Stockhausen glasses.So...what if "Virilio =
endorses Karlheinz Stockhausen's claim that the 911 suicides were tragic wo=
rks of art..."?Is there some trace you could find non-consistenncy?Is someb=
ody's opservation wrong by default if you couldn't find confirmation of you=
r own insight in matter?
> I doubt that he would support someone as bland, and corporate as Koons.
MANIK:We shouldn't take your suspicion serious,actualy we don't care for th=
em .As mature man you should take care about your words.
>You can't get here from there without some danger in a world bathed in ima=
gery. How can Koons be so comfortable?
>Interventionists like CAE seem far more engaging, and relevant.
MANIK:Rob already explained "how can Koons be so comfortable",and why he c=
an be "so comfortable".(What do you think,he wrote to kill some time?)
It's just double transformation you obvious can't falow.
>He isn't endorsing the act, just illuminating the tragedy.
MANIK:Who of them?
>I honestly can't look at Koons, or many other artists from the 80's and 9=
0's the same way after 911.
MANIK:Isn't it your problem?We could(perhaps) talk about completely differe=
nt aproach to aesthetic substance between you and MANIK/Rob,but what you ca=
n,or can not look...
We are not interested in your private daydreams.We are unpleasant suprised =
with your mail,so what?
If you still think that fact that you are American excuse your superficial,=
or just mentioned of 911 provoke
empathy and all kind of question in every single soul on the world...you ar=
e wrong.
>Until this is somehow concluded, and I have no idea how it will be met and=
assimilated, we are still in the same state >we were 4 1/2 years ago.
MANIK:Who is in same state?MANIK already explain in his article directed to=
Manovich(via Rhizom_Raw,Saturday, December 10, 2005 4:08 AM)what he think =
about "WE" and have no need to repeat that for this occasion.Essence's that
when you said "we"that assume much more than we(MANIK)said same word.So "we=
"don't acept your "we"in sense you mean, when you said "we"...
There's joke about Serb in Sweden.He wrote home:"They stay behind us twenty=
years.In Sweden is stil good life."
And,finaly,kind gesture of J.Koons who agree to wrote few words about our w=
ork show his good upbringing.
MANIK