manik vauda marija manik nikola pilipovic
Since 2002
Works in United States of America

ARTBASE (1)
BIO
Belgrade artists Marija Vauda and Nikola Pilipovic have been
collaborating as MANIK since 1999.Their work reflects the
march of history, sometimes literally outside their studio, and a
dialogue with the international artistic community through
organisations and events such as Rhizome and Free Manifesta. Tiija is
their first weblog piece, their previous work has been in mediums as
diverse as video, performance, happenings, email, painting and
installation.

Discussions (1017) Opportunities (0) Events (0) Jobs (0)
DISCUSSION

Re: Re:


I LOVE YOU!
----- Original Message -----
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
To: "Joseph Franklyn McElroy Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance] Art[ist]"
<joseph@electrichands.com>
Cc: <thingist@BBS.THING.NET>; <list@rhizome.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Re:

> On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Joseph Franklyn McElroy Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance]
Art[ist] wrote:
>
> I am a passive leech incapable of conceiving or creating.
>
> later.
>
>
> + une dans la gueule, and two for tea !
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>

DISCUSSION

Re: Re: [thingist] NN, Max Herman, Eryk Salvaggio + J. McElroy


I LOVE YOU!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Franklyn McElroy Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance] Art[ist]"
<joseph@electrichands.com>
To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
Cc: <thingist@BBS.THING.NET>; <list@rhizome.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 10:04 PM
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: [thingist] NN, Max Herman, Eryk Salvaggio + J.
McElroy

> Marvellous
>
> --
> Joseph Franklyn McElroy
> Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance] Art[ist]T
> Take the survey they are all talking about...
> http://www.electrichands.com/genius2000
> Electric Hands, Inc
> 212.255.4527
> www.electrichands.com
> joseph@electrichands.com
>
>
> Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>:
>
> > On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Joseph Franklyn McElroy Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance]
> > Art[ist] wrote:
> >
> > > Largely of no use. These human invented architypes all fail to be
complete
> > and
> > > are the hubris of the people who created them.
> >
> > Not at all. Nothing is 'human invented'. Nor are these archetypes.
> > As for hubris--your commentary betrays lack of understanding.
> > But that's no surprise--you're not qualified to understand these.
> >
> > Before you deal with your Self--you will not be.
> >
> >
> > > Speaking of that, I am creating my own set of architypes and am
looking for
> > > disciples to spread the word.
> >
> > Ie, sheer self-destructive egotistical idiocy.
> >
> > `, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
>
>
>
>
> + une dans la gueule, and two for tea !
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>

DISCUSSION

Re: problems on Rhizome Raw


I just cann't give up from 'rhizom".There's so many interested opinions.As I
see you lockin for "rhizom" main stream.WASP?
MANIK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rachel Greene" <rachel@rhizome.org>
To: "rhizome" <list@rhizome.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: problems on Rhizome Raw

>
> Dear Rhizome Raw Subscribers:
>
> There have been some serious problems on the list recently. A number of
> people have been engaging in personal attacks, abusive emails and
> high-volume posting. We have received many emails from raw subscribers who
> feel frustrated and demoralized by what is seen as an abuse of a community
> resource. We are concerned that Rhizome Raw is no longer able to function
> as an inclusive community resource.
>
> We share these feelings of frustration, but find the problem a difficult
> one to address. While rules and limits can help a public sphere function,
> the policing of public speech is not something to be taken lightly. With
> one brief exception, Raw has never been moderated. Until recently, Raw has
> somehow managed to function as a total free-for-all, a funky mix of
serious
> discourse, banter, announcements, identity pranks, ASCII art and other
> things. There have always been off-topic posts, but somehow the community
> managed to function without any interference from Rhizome workers.
>
> Instead of putting Raw into moderated mode, or unsubscribing people who
> abuse the list, we propose to reinstate the Rhizome Rare email list as a
> moderated version of Raw. Previously, Rare consisted of four channels that
> were filtered by an editorial intern. The new Rare would be a single
> channel that consists of texts selected by superusers. Raw would remain an
> unfiltered list. Those who are tired of the current tenor and activity on
> Raw could migrate to Rare. Those who can take the heat can stay in the
fire.
>
> We'd like to get the new Rhizome Rare going by early October.
>
> What do people think about this model?
>
> In the meantime, we encourage you to conserve your Rhizome time and energy
> by using the filtering features of your email software.
>
> Best,
>
> Rachel
>
>
>
> + If the reader will keep me company I shall be glad.
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>

DISCUSSION

red


> Hi Max,after my last mesagge some"moderators"denide me asses to
their(!?!)net.It's best thay ever make.It's not subversive to talk about
something,or somebody"important",subversive is to think.Anyway
this"Rhizom"stuf is totaly opozit of IDEA of rhizom(Deleuze&Guattari).That's
all with moderator guard remind me on some snobish golf club.About
indifference you can find nice material on
Internet:Phyrro,Scepticism,Duchamp-Witgenstein,Ethic-Aestetic,Nichilism
etc...If you want,you are welcome on my mail,out of "rhizom".
MANIK
> Monstrous indifference Manik as though people have become machines? I
would
> like to hear more of this theory. The
monstrosity/abomination/executionist
> theory of indifference you describe.
>
> '68 tactics won't work because nothing will work.
>
> Now we begin to be archived....
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>
> + If the reader will keep me company I shall be glad.
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>

DISCUSSION

Re: red


As I told to Doug "There's no the end".I dont understand "sneeze",it's
boring to read dictionary for proper "rhizomers" food.You are wellcome on my
mail out of "rhizom".
MANIK
----- Original Message -----
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
To: "manik" <manik@ptt.yu>
Cc: "Max Herman" <maxnmherman@hotmail.com>; <list@rhizome.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:09 AM
Subject: Re: red

> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, manik wrote:
>
> > subversive is to think.
>
> Real subversive. Why bother with the Church Fathers?
> Give them a 'scientific' theory--they're well-trained
> to bash themselves over their heads all on their own.
> In one fell swoop we remove the 'awful' 'ruling class,'
> make them think it's the ruling class's fault for their
> suppression, and huzzah! Everyone's insta-independent.
> Self-modulated self-destruction. Don't let anyone tell you
> anything: you've got a brain of your own!
>
> The Apocalypse will certainly be self-righteous.
> And very, very intelligent.
>
> Sneeze.
>
> `, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42,
>
>
>
>