A blow to hacktivism?
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>A blow to hacktivism?</title></head><body>
<div><a
href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,54040,00.html"
>http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,54040,00.html</a></div>
</body>
</html>
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>A blow to hacktivism?</title></head><body>
<div><a
href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,54040,00.html"
>http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,54040,00.html</a></div>
</body>
</html>
Blame the bandwidth
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Blame the bandwidth</title></head><body>
<div>Is it a bandwidth issue?</div>
<div>Is it censorship?</div>
<div>Is is protecting copyrights?</div>
<div>Is it a way to wipe out competition?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><font color="#000000"> </font></div>
<div><font
color="#000000"
>--------------------------------------------------------------------<span
></span>----<x-tab>
</x-tab><br>
<font size="+1"><b>Entertainment - E! Online
Industry</b></font></font></div>
<div><font size="+2" color="#000000"><b>Studios Waging Web
War</b></font><font color="#000000"><br>
</font><font size="-3" color="#999999">Sat Jul 27, 4:00 PM
ET</font><font color="#000000"><br>
<br>
<font size="-1"><i>By Josh Grossberg</i></font></font><br>
<font color="#000000"></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">Forget peer-to-peer. Cease and desist
may become the phrase to describe online file sharing.</font><br>
<font color="#000000"></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">Mirroring the recording industry's efforts
against illegal online music swapping, the Motion Picture Association
of America has declared war on the increasing number of pirates who
engage in</font><font color="#0000FF"><u> illegal movie and video
trading</u></font><font color="#000000">.<br>
<br>
The MPAA--the organization that represents the studios--has developed
special software to search the Web and file-sharing networks and
identify copyrighted movies. So far, the MPAA has issued more than
100,000 legal notices to Internet service providers ordering them to
take "immediate action" against Netizens unlawfully
downloading films.<br>
<br>
As a result, ISPs not wanting to be on the business end of an MPAA
lawsuit have either forced users to halt downloading big files or, in
many cases, have cut off offenders' access altogether. MPAA
chief Jack Valenti says the crackdown was justified.<br>
<br>
"According to Viant, a Boston-based consulting film, some 400,000
to 600,000 films are illegally downloaded every day. The
protection of creative works in the digital environment is an issue of
great importance, not solely to Hollywood, but to consumers who desire
online movies at a fair and reasonable price," Valenti tells E!
Online. "We are anxious to provide such services but it is
imperative that some basic security exists to provide protection for
high valuable digital works in the online environment."<br>
<br>
Larger than the average MP3 song file, movie files tend to average
more than 600 megabytes and take at least eight hours to download--a
weakness the MPAA and studios hope to exploit.<br>
<br>
For instance, AOL Time Warner--whose subsidiaries include the Warner
Bros. studio and Warner Music Group--is clamping down on movie piracy
through its AOL Time Warner Cable, which provides high-speed broadband
access. The cable division has begun identifying and blocking those
users on its service who transfer huge amounts of data.<br>
<br>
Of course, the losers in this whole gambit may be those people trading
large digital files of their own creations and not pirating the latest
copy of<i> The Matrix</i> or<i> A.I.</i>.<br>
<br>
But that hardly seems to bother Time Warner, whose reps claim the
company adopted the plan to halt the hogging of bandwidth , and not
necessarily to crack down on pirating.<br>
<br>
"We are not blocking the use of any applications or access to any
Websites," Mark Harrad, a spokesman for Time Warner Cable,
explains to the Associated Press. "But we are doing various
things to manage bandwidth better and to interfere with people who are
in violation of [their] service agreements."<br>
<br>
There have been some casualties in the early goings, however.<br>
<br>
</font><font color="#0000FF"><u>InternetMovies.com</u></font><font
color="#000000">, a movie news Website based in Hawaii, is suing the
MPAA after it was forced to temporarily shut down after receiving
legal threats accusing it of digital piracy.<br>
<br>
"All of us at InternetMovies.com are sorry, MPAA, that you are
going through hard times with movie piracy on the Internet, but
harassing this Website does not make you any better. We talk about
good things too, like ways to solve your problems and non-infringing
movie sites," the site's publisher writes on its home page.<br>
<br>
Meanwhile, the recording and film industries are also taking their
fight to Congress.<br>
<br>
This week, Representative Howard Berman introduced a bill that would
give entertainment companies the ability to fight online pirates with
an array of high-tech weapons, including fake files, blocking software
and programs that can search and delete copyrighted material on a
downloader's hard drive. (The California Democrat is the House's
single largest recipient of political donations from the entertainment
industry, according to the Associated Press.)</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br>
A similar beat-pirates-at-their-own-game strategy was used by
Universal's Interscope Records last month. Worried about a
proliferation of bootlegged copies of</font><font color="#0000FF"><u>
Eminem</u></font><font color="#000000">'s new album,</font><font
color="#0000FF"><i> The Eminem Show</i></font><font color="#000000">,
the label flooded music-swapping sites with song files that contained
incomplete tracks. It became difficult for online traders to tell the
differences between the bogus files and the real deal.<br>
<br>
Such tactics will also help battle overseas' pirates, who have an
easier time escaping U.S. and international copyright police.<br>
<br>
For now, however, the low-tech approach seems to be working for the
MPAA. According to Ken Jacobsen, the group's senior vice president of
worldwide antipiracy, most users have complied with the
cease-and-desist letters, and almost all ISPs have cooperated in the
investigation, not only because they fear the wrath of the MPAA's
cadre of attorneys, but they also want users to stop hogging
bandwidth.<br>
<br>
But Jacobsen acknowledges that if the MPAA and movie studios don't act
quickly to get a handle on the piracy problem now, it could spiral out
of their control to the point where billions in revenue off their
copyright works could be lost. </font><br>
<font color="#000000"></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">"Our industry," he tells the
Associated Press, "could be damaged as much as the music
industry."<br>
</font></div>
</body>
</html>
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Blame the bandwidth</title></head><body>
<div>Is it a bandwidth issue?</div>
<div>Is it censorship?</div>
<div>Is is protecting copyrights?</div>
<div>Is it a way to wipe out competition?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><font color="#000000"> </font></div>
<div><font
color="#000000"
>--------------------------------------------------------------------<span
></span>----<x-tab>
</x-tab><br>
<font size="+1"><b>Entertainment - E! Online
Industry</b></font></font></div>
<div><font size="+2" color="#000000"><b>Studios Waging Web
War</b></font><font color="#000000"><br>
</font><font size="-3" color="#999999">Sat Jul 27, 4:00 PM
ET</font><font color="#000000"><br>
<br>
<font size="-1"><i>By Josh Grossberg</i></font></font><br>
<font color="#000000"></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">Forget peer-to-peer. Cease and desist
may become the phrase to describe online file sharing.</font><br>
<font color="#000000"></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">Mirroring the recording industry's efforts
against illegal online music swapping, the Motion Picture Association
of America has declared war on the increasing number of pirates who
engage in</font><font color="#0000FF"><u> illegal movie and video
trading</u></font><font color="#000000">.<br>
<br>
The MPAA--the organization that represents the studios--has developed
special software to search the Web and file-sharing networks and
identify copyrighted movies. So far, the MPAA has issued more than
100,000 legal notices to Internet service providers ordering them to
take "immediate action" against Netizens unlawfully
downloading films.<br>
<br>
As a result, ISPs not wanting to be on the business end of an MPAA
lawsuit have either forced users to halt downloading big files or, in
many cases, have cut off offenders' access altogether. MPAA
chief Jack Valenti says the crackdown was justified.<br>
<br>
"According to Viant, a Boston-based consulting film, some 400,000
to 600,000 films are illegally downloaded every day. The
protection of creative works in the digital environment is an issue of
great importance, not solely to Hollywood, but to consumers who desire
online movies at a fair and reasonable price," Valenti tells E!
Online. "We are anxious to provide such services but it is
imperative that some basic security exists to provide protection for
high valuable digital works in the online environment."<br>
<br>
Larger than the average MP3 song file, movie files tend to average
more than 600 megabytes and take at least eight hours to download--a
weakness the MPAA and studios hope to exploit.<br>
<br>
For instance, AOL Time Warner--whose subsidiaries include the Warner
Bros. studio and Warner Music Group--is clamping down on movie piracy
through its AOL Time Warner Cable, which provides high-speed broadband
access. The cable division has begun identifying and blocking those
users on its service who transfer huge amounts of data.<br>
<br>
Of course, the losers in this whole gambit may be those people trading
large digital files of their own creations and not pirating the latest
copy of<i> The Matrix</i> or<i> A.I.</i>.<br>
<br>
But that hardly seems to bother Time Warner, whose reps claim the
company adopted the plan to halt the hogging of bandwidth , and not
necessarily to crack down on pirating.<br>
<br>
"We are not blocking the use of any applications or access to any
Websites," Mark Harrad, a spokesman for Time Warner Cable,
explains to the Associated Press. "But we are doing various
things to manage bandwidth better and to interfere with people who are
in violation of [their] service agreements."<br>
<br>
There have been some casualties in the early goings, however.<br>
<br>
</font><font color="#0000FF"><u>InternetMovies.com</u></font><font
color="#000000">, a movie news Website based in Hawaii, is suing the
MPAA after it was forced to temporarily shut down after receiving
legal threats accusing it of digital piracy.<br>
<br>
"All of us at InternetMovies.com are sorry, MPAA, that you are
going through hard times with movie piracy on the Internet, but
harassing this Website does not make you any better. We talk about
good things too, like ways to solve your problems and non-infringing
movie sites," the site's publisher writes on its home page.<br>
<br>
Meanwhile, the recording and film industries are also taking their
fight to Congress.<br>
<br>
This week, Representative Howard Berman introduced a bill that would
give entertainment companies the ability to fight online pirates with
an array of high-tech weapons, including fake files, blocking software
and programs that can search and delete copyrighted material on a
downloader's hard drive. (The California Democrat is the House's
single largest recipient of political donations from the entertainment
industry, according to the Associated Press.)</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br>
A similar beat-pirates-at-their-own-game strategy was used by
Universal's Interscope Records last month. Worried about a
proliferation of bootlegged copies of</font><font color="#0000FF"><u>
Eminem</u></font><font color="#000000">'s new album,</font><font
color="#0000FF"><i> The Eminem Show</i></font><font color="#000000">,
the label flooded music-swapping sites with song files that contained
incomplete tracks. It became difficult for online traders to tell the
differences between the bogus files and the real deal.<br>
<br>
Such tactics will also help battle overseas' pirates, who have an
easier time escaping U.S. and international copyright police.<br>
<br>
For now, however, the low-tech approach seems to be working for the
MPAA. According to Ken Jacobsen, the group's senior vice president of
worldwide antipiracy, most users have complied with the
cease-and-desist letters, and almost all ISPs have cooperated in the
investigation, not only because they fear the wrath of the MPAA's
cadre of attorneys, but they also want users to stop hogging
bandwidth.<br>
<br>
But Jacobsen acknowledges that if the MPAA and movie studios don't act
quickly to get a handle on the piracy problem now, it could spiral out
of their control to the point where billions in revenue off their
copyright works could be lost. </font><br>
<font color="#000000"></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000">"Our industry," he tells the
Associated Press, "could be damaged as much as the music
industry."<br>
</font></div>
</body>
</html>
GEN XY vs Godzilla
Technology - Reuters Internet Report
Web Filtering Lawsuit Challenges U.S. Copyright Law
Thu Jul 25, 5:33 PM ET
By Elinor Mills Abreu
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A 22-year-old law student filed a lawsuit
on Thursday asking a federal court in Boston to let him crack the
digital lock on software that filters Internet Web sites so that he
and others can view blocked sites, some of which he says are useful
to the public.
The suit, filed by the New York-based American Civil Liberties Union
( news - web sites) on behalf of Ben Edelman, challenges the
controversial Digital Millennium Copyright Act ( news - web sites)
(DMCA) of 1998. The law prohibits creation or distribution of tools
that can be used to unlock digital copyright protections.
Edelman, who will enter Harvard Law School in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, in the fall and is a technology analyst at The Berkman
Center for Internet & Society there, claims the filtering software is
flawed and blocks legitimate Web sites rather than just the
pornographic sites it purports to target.
"The core reason filtering software is of concern at the moment is
because it is being forced upon a substantial number of Americans as
they attempt to use the Internet in their local public libraries,
public schools, businesses and even in their homes," Edelman told
Reuters.
For example, a product from Seattle-based N2H2 Inc., named as the
defendant in the lawsuit, blocks breast cancer ( news - web sites)
Web sites and others with vital public health information, such as
the Asian Community Aids ( news - web sites) Services organization,
Edelman said.
The Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), which took effect in
2001, requires that public libraries and schools receiving federal
funds use filtering software on their Internet-connected computers.
The ACLU challenged the library provision of that law in a lawsuit
filed in March 2001. A Pennsylvania federal judge overturned the law
in May 2002 and the case is on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court (
news - web sites).
Edelman wants to publish the list of blocked sites and distribute
software that would enable others to see the Web sites. The lawsuit
argues that it is within his "fair use" rights under the U.S.
Constitution to do research on the software.
CENSORSHIP TOOL
Filtering software is also being used by governments in other
countries to censor and restrict access to the Internet for
politically motivated reasons, including China, Vietnam, Uzbekistan
and Saudi Arabia, Edelman said.
He said his research found that Saudi Arabia had restricted access to
Web pages including the "woman" entry from the Encyclopedia
Britannica," and the Amnesty International site.
N2H2 is one of the companies vying for a contract to supply Saudi
Arabia with blocking software, the ACLU said.
Part of the lawsuit challenges N2H2's software license agreement,
which prohibits customers from decrypting or otherwise reverse
engineering the software.
The lawsuit claims the license agreement is unenforceable because by
installing the product the customer is forced to automatically
consent to the terms of the agreement and cannot negotiate, Ann
Beeson, ACLU lead counsel on the case, told Reuters.
N2H2 spokesman David Burt told Reuters, "We believe our software
licenses are valid and we do intend to defend them and our
intellectual property."
Other DMCA challenges have not held up.
An appellate judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by a Princeton professor
who feared recording companies would sue him over research into
digital music copyright protections. And movie studios successfully
sued Eric Corley after he published software to decrypt DVDs on his
hacker Web site, 2600.
In another case, trial is set to begin Aug. 26 for Moscow-based
ElcomSoft Co. Ltd., which was sued for selling software to unlock
copyright protections on digital books.
Web Filtering Lawsuit Challenges U.S. Copyright Law
Thu Jul 25, 5:33 PM ET
By Elinor Mills Abreu
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A 22-year-old law student filed a lawsuit
on Thursday asking a federal court in Boston to let him crack the
digital lock on software that filters Internet Web sites so that he
and others can view blocked sites, some of which he says are useful
to the public.
The suit, filed by the New York-based American Civil Liberties Union
( news - web sites) on behalf of Ben Edelman, challenges the
controversial Digital Millennium Copyright Act ( news - web sites)
(DMCA) of 1998. The law prohibits creation or distribution of tools
that can be used to unlock digital copyright protections.
Edelman, who will enter Harvard Law School in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, in the fall and is a technology analyst at The Berkman
Center for Internet & Society there, claims the filtering software is
flawed and blocks legitimate Web sites rather than just the
pornographic sites it purports to target.
"The core reason filtering software is of concern at the moment is
because it is being forced upon a substantial number of Americans as
they attempt to use the Internet in their local public libraries,
public schools, businesses and even in their homes," Edelman told
Reuters.
For example, a product from Seattle-based N2H2 Inc., named as the
defendant in the lawsuit, blocks breast cancer ( news - web sites)
Web sites and others with vital public health information, such as
the Asian Community Aids ( news - web sites) Services organization,
Edelman said.
The Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), which took effect in
2001, requires that public libraries and schools receiving federal
funds use filtering software on their Internet-connected computers.
The ACLU challenged the library provision of that law in a lawsuit
filed in March 2001. A Pennsylvania federal judge overturned the law
in May 2002 and the case is on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court (
news - web sites).
Edelman wants to publish the list of blocked sites and distribute
software that would enable others to see the Web sites. The lawsuit
argues that it is within his "fair use" rights under the U.S.
Constitution to do research on the software.
CENSORSHIP TOOL
Filtering software is also being used by governments in other
countries to censor and restrict access to the Internet for
politically motivated reasons, including China, Vietnam, Uzbekistan
and Saudi Arabia, Edelman said.
He said his research found that Saudi Arabia had restricted access to
Web pages including the "woman" entry from the Encyclopedia
Britannica," and the Amnesty International site.
N2H2 is one of the companies vying for a contract to supply Saudi
Arabia with blocking software, the ACLU said.
Part of the lawsuit challenges N2H2's software license agreement,
which prohibits customers from decrypting or otherwise reverse
engineering the software.
The lawsuit claims the license agreement is unenforceable because by
installing the product the customer is forced to automatically
consent to the terms of the agreement and cannot negotiate, Ann
Beeson, ACLU lead counsel on the case, told Reuters.
N2H2 spokesman David Burt told Reuters, "We believe our software
licenses are valid and we do intend to defend them and our
intellectual property."
Other DMCA challenges have not held up.
An appellate judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by a Princeton professor
who feared recording companies would sue him over research into
digital music copyright protections. And movie studios successfully
sued Eric Corley after he published software to decrypt DVDs on his
hacker Web site, 2600.
In another case, trial is set to begin Aug. 26 for Moscow-based
ElcomSoft Co. Ltd., which was sued for selling software to unlock
copyright protections on digital books.
Relax Laws to Boost Web Security, Officials Say
Technology - Reuters Internet Report
Relax Laws to Boost Web Security, Officials Say
Wed Jul 24, 8:34 PM ET
By Andy Sullivan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Bush administration officials called on
Congress to relax open-government laws on Wednesday to help fight
computer crime, drawing a sharp response from a Democratic lawmaker
who said the move would create a haven for corporate abuses.
Computer security experts from the FBI ( news - web sites) and the
Commerce Department ( news - web sites) told a House of
Representatives subcommittee that the move was necessary to encourage
private firms to share information about Internet-based attacks.
Although 5,000 companies have agreed to disclose information about
Web site hacks, denial-of-service ( news - web sites) attacks and
other online intrusions with law enforcement authorities, many are
still reluctant to participate due to fears that
freedom-of-information laws could expose corporate secrets, they told
the House subcommittee on government efficiency, financial management
and intergovernmental relations.
Information submitted to the government about attacks on business
computer systems or other "critical infrastructure" would be exempt
from public disclosure, and could not be used in any lawsuit, under
sweeping legislation that would create a new Department of Homeland
Security.
Illinois Rep. Jan Schakowsky said the measure would enable companies
to hide information about polluting facilities and other undesirable
secrets.
"If a company wants to protect information from public view, they
could dump it in the Department of Homeland Security and say, 'We
don't want anybody to have access to it," the Illinois Democrat said.
The House is expected to take up debate on the bill Thursday.
REPORTING NECESSARY TO DETER CYBER ATTACKS
Fears of an Internet-based attack that could debilitate power plants,
airports or other vital facilities have increased exponentially since
Sept. 11.
Law enforcement authorities say it is vital for these facilities to
let authorities know when they detect an intrusion, so government can
analyze the attacks and other businesses can defend against them.
Corporate trade secrets provided to the government are already exempt
from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, known as FOIA,
and receive further protection from a directive issued by President
Reagan.
But many businesses deem the exemptions too vague, and decline to
share information with law-enforcement authorities, said Ronald Dick,
director of the FBI's National Infrastructure Protection Center. A
recent survey found that although 90 percent of companies suffered
Internet-based attacks, only 34 percent reported the attacks to law
enforcement, he said.
"They want a simple statute they can understand. Without that many
companies will not share information," Dick said.
Dick's testimony was echoed by John Tritak, director of a Commerce
Department cybercrime office, and by computer security experts from
the private sector.
The testimony drew an irate response from Schakowsky, who said that
private industry was exploiting fears of terrorism to create a
loophole that would allow them to hide sensitive information from
public scrutiny.
"It astounds me that in a moment in history when transparency in
business is in the headlines every day ... we want to offer, in my
view, not a narrowly offered exemption to FOIA but a loophole big
enough to drive any corporation and its secrets through," the
Illinois Democrat said.
Schakowsky said she would try to remove the provision when the bill
comes up for debate, and suggested that perhaps companies should be
required to report Internet intrusions.
Relax Laws to Boost Web Security, Officials Say
Wed Jul 24, 8:34 PM ET
By Andy Sullivan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Bush administration officials called on
Congress to relax open-government laws on Wednesday to help fight
computer crime, drawing a sharp response from a Democratic lawmaker
who said the move would create a haven for corporate abuses.
Computer security experts from the FBI ( news - web sites) and the
Commerce Department ( news - web sites) told a House of
Representatives subcommittee that the move was necessary to encourage
private firms to share information about Internet-based attacks.
Although 5,000 companies have agreed to disclose information about
Web site hacks, denial-of-service ( news - web sites) attacks and
other online intrusions with law enforcement authorities, many are
still reluctant to participate due to fears that
freedom-of-information laws could expose corporate secrets, they told
the House subcommittee on government efficiency, financial management
and intergovernmental relations.
Information submitted to the government about attacks on business
computer systems or other "critical infrastructure" would be exempt
from public disclosure, and could not be used in any lawsuit, under
sweeping legislation that would create a new Department of Homeland
Security.
Illinois Rep. Jan Schakowsky said the measure would enable companies
to hide information about polluting facilities and other undesirable
secrets.
"If a company wants to protect information from public view, they
could dump it in the Department of Homeland Security and say, 'We
don't want anybody to have access to it," the Illinois Democrat said.
The House is expected to take up debate on the bill Thursday.
REPORTING NECESSARY TO DETER CYBER ATTACKS
Fears of an Internet-based attack that could debilitate power plants,
airports or other vital facilities have increased exponentially since
Sept. 11.
Law enforcement authorities say it is vital for these facilities to
let authorities know when they detect an intrusion, so government can
analyze the attacks and other businesses can defend against them.
Corporate trade secrets provided to the government are already exempt
from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, known as FOIA,
and receive further protection from a directive issued by President
Reagan.
But many businesses deem the exemptions too vague, and decline to
share information with law-enforcement authorities, said Ronald Dick,
director of the FBI's National Infrastructure Protection Center. A
recent survey found that although 90 percent of companies suffered
Internet-based attacks, only 34 percent reported the attacks to law
enforcement, he said.
"They want a simple statute they can understand. Without that many
companies will not share information," Dick said.
Dick's testimony was echoed by John Tritak, director of a Commerce
Department cybercrime office, and by computer security experts from
the private sector.
The testimony drew an irate response from Schakowsky, who said that
private industry was exploiting fears of terrorism to create a
loophole that would allow them to hide sensitive information from
public scrutiny.
"It astounds me that in a moment in history when transparency in
business is in the headlines every day ... we want to offer, in my
view, not a narrowly offered exemption to FOIA but a loophole big
enough to drive any corporation and its secrets through," the
Illinois Democrat said.
Schakowsky said she would try to remove the provision when the bill
comes up for debate, and suggested that perhaps companies should be
required to report Internet intrusions.
It's 10 o'clock . . .
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>It's 10 o'clock . . .</title></head><body>
<div>Have you reported your neighbor yet? <a
href="http://www.citizencorps.gov/index.html"
>http://www.citizencorps.gov/index.html</a></div>
</body>
</html>
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>It's 10 o'clock . . .</title></head><body>
<div>Have you reported your neighbor yet? <a
href="http://www.citizencorps.gov/index.html"
>http://www.citizencorps.gov/index.html</a></div>
</body>
</html>