ARTBASE (1)
BIO
Joy Garnett is a painter based in New York. She appropriates news images from the Internet and re-invents them as paintings. Her subject is the apocalyptic-sublime landscape, as well as the digital image itself as cultural artifact in an increasingly technologized world. Her image research has resulted in online documentation projects, most notably The Bomb Project.
Notable past exhibitions include her recent solo shows at Winkleman Gallery, New York and at the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC; group exhibitions organized by the Whitney Museum of American Art, P.S.1/MoMA Contemporary Art Center, Artists Space, White Columns (New York), Kettle's Yard, Cambridge (UK), and De Witte Zaal, Ghent (Belgium). She shows with aeroplastics contemporary, Brussels, Belgium.
extended network >
homepage:
http://joygarnett.com
The Bomb Project
http://www.thebombproject.org
First Pulse Projects
http://firstpulseprojects.net
NEWSgrist - where spin is art
http://newsgrist.typepad.com/
Notable past exhibitions include her recent solo shows at Winkleman Gallery, New York and at the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC; group exhibitions organized by the Whitney Museum of American Art, P.S.1/MoMA Contemporary Art Center, Artists Space, White Columns (New York), Kettle's Yard, Cambridge (UK), and De Witte Zaal, Ghent (Belgium). She shows with aeroplastics contemporary, Brussels, Belgium.
extended network >
homepage:
http://joygarnett.com
The Bomb Project
http://www.thebombproject.org
First Pulse Projects
http://firstpulseprojects.net
NEWSgrist - where spin is art
http://newsgrist.typepad.com/
Re: not so sad, Re: The sadness of the dream of Pixar.
With all due respect Pall, et al.:
As far as I know, being a fully engaged "devoted artist" requires working
and juggling a full-time job -- most anywhere, but certainly here in the NYC
coffee-grinder, aka "art market central" (with the notable exceptions of
trust-fund babies and blue-chippers). There are zillions of artists who live
this crazy struggle out of neccessity without making a tenth of what we
would if we worked for Pixar.
Much of the discussion here (with a few exceptions such as Zev's post) waxes
nostalgic for an avant garde that hasn't existed in yonks... I'd say the
stuff to toss out are the trite "starving artist" cliches and those stale
post-modern (ie: "dead") moralistic orthodoxies of "hi-lo" culture... okay,
back to work; wake me when it's over.
On 12/19/05, Pall Thayer <p_thay@alcor.concordia.ca> wrote:
>
> >
> > There are worse jobs in the world than being a Pixar animator, and
> > if that is what someone wants to do, then good luck to them, maybe
> > they'll be contributing to another enjoyable pixar film, and/or
> > gain some technical knowledge and do something hip and subversive
> > on their own time....
>
> Comments like this always get to me. Being an artist isn't something
> that you do "on [your] own time". It's a full-time job. It's not a
> hobby. Sometimes artists need a job on the side to pay the bills but
> being an artist takes a lot of devotion. Devotion that you're not
> going to muster if you're working a pion 8 am to 10 pm job at Pixar.
> Sure, if that's what you want, go for it. But don't fool yourself
> into thinking that you're going to be able to have a meaningful art
> practice on the side.
>
> Pall
>
> >
> > just my 2 cents worth.
>
> Sorry, but to me that comment dropped the worth to zilch.
>
> >
> > Zev
> >
> > Zev Robinson
> > www.artafterscience.com
> > www.zrdesign.co.uk
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "mark cooley" <flawedart@yahoo.com>
> > To: <list@rhizome.org>
> > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 5:50 AM
> > Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: The sadness of the dream of Pixar.
> >
> >
> >> i'm sympathetic with the view that students are shortchanging
> >> themselves. it's nice to see patrick sum up a lot of the
> >> frustrations i have as a teacher, and sad to see that the pixar
> >> flu is an epidemic (one would like to think that it's only at
> >> one's own school and the grass is somehow greener, or a little
> >> less well rendered at least, somewhere else). i do think that it
> >> is important not to revert to modernist assumptions of high and
> >> low art and to judge Pixaritis on such a basis (although it is
> >> tempting at times). that's why i'm happy to see that patrick
> >> commenting on the mythologies of success (in pixar terms) and why
> >> it might not be in the student's best interest (regardless of the
> >> hype) to even think twice about working as a human machine for
> >> someone elses profit. The sad fact is that many art students
> >> don't care about being artists and much of my time in the
> >> classroom is spent assuming that they do want to be artists.
> >> hence, the frustration.
> >>
> >> mark
> >>
> >>
> >> patrick lichty wrote:
> >>
> >>> My colleagues and I went to see Chronicles of Narnia last night,
> >>> and I
> >>> thought more about this converstation.
> >>>
> >>> The sadness of all this is that the students are aspiring to be
> >>> people
> >>> who create someone else's vision.
> >>>
> >>> This is what I feel is the tragedy of it all. To me, being an
> >>> artist
> >>> is
> >>> about generating your own ideas, vision, etc. It isn't about
> >>> realizing
> >>> someone else's. I'm not talking about the Modernist view of the
> >>> artist-as-genius, but I am talking about the functional difference
> >>> between being a generator of ideas and merely an agent of
> >>> realization.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> One requires a lot more thought than the other.
> >>>
> >>> In the US, kids are taught to want to learn just what they need to
> >>> know
> >>> to get a job. This is where Postman was so right about Technopoly.
> >>> Results-based learning gears expectations to be complacent with the
> >>> pigeonhole, more or less. The problem is that they don't tell the
> >>> kids
> >>> that the pigeonhole could be eliminated by outsourcing, market
> >>> pressures, or any number of factors that could cause a bottom-line
> >>> conscious corporation to 'shift its human resource requirements' for
> >>> any
> >>> number of reasons, including the hiring of more creative people from
> >>> global labor pools in the future. The dream of Pixar is short term,
> >>> in
> >>> tems of the students.
> >>>
> >>> Some will say that the idea is to get them into industry so they can
> >>> start getting experience so they can rise to the point where they
> >>> can
> >>> have creative freedom.
> >>>
> >>> I understand we all have to eat. However, then why the hell are you
> >>> going to art school? To merely master a set of perceptual and
> >>> realization skills so you can actualize them LATER? This makes no
> >>> sense
> >>> to me. Why are you going to an art school than going to a technical
> >>> school?
> >>>
> >>> Therefore:
> >>> The dream of Pixar:
> >>> 1: Short-term
> >>> 2: Driven by corporate entertainment media cash
> >>> 3: Results-driven (productivity of 'creative' entertainment media
> >>> that
> >>> judges its merit on market success)
> >>> 4: short-changes the individuality/vision of the artist,
> >>> 5: Subjugates students to an unstable/uncertain corporate media
> >>> production paradigm.
> >>> 6: Is intellectually bereft / discourages critical engagement /
> >>> discourages thought/reflection to emphasize entertainment.
> >>> 7: Is elitist as a high art paradigm, but Pixar's elitism is
> >>> driven by
> >>> the industrial/entertainment sector, not high culture. You still
> >>> have
> >>> to have the same sorts of levels of validation, which are also
> >>> extremely
> >>> hard to pass.
> >>>
> >>> It's as if the students were going to extraordinary lengths not to
> >>> think, when they might actually find it easier to do so.
> >>>
> >>> Pick your poison.
> >>>
> >>> I can come up with a few more, I'm sure.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> +
> >> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> >> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> >> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/
> >> subscribe.rhiz
> >> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> >> +
> >> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> >> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/
> >> 29.php
> >
> > +
> > -> post: list@rhizome.org
> > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/
> > subscribe.rhiz
> > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> > +
> > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/
> > 29.php
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Pall Thayer
> p_thay@alcor.concordia.ca
> http://www.this.is/pallit
>
>
>
>
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
As far as I know, being a fully engaged "devoted artist" requires working
and juggling a full-time job -- most anywhere, but certainly here in the NYC
coffee-grinder, aka "art market central" (with the notable exceptions of
trust-fund babies and blue-chippers). There are zillions of artists who live
this crazy struggle out of neccessity without making a tenth of what we
would if we worked for Pixar.
Much of the discussion here (with a few exceptions such as Zev's post) waxes
nostalgic for an avant garde that hasn't existed in yonks... I'd say the
stuff to toss out are the trite "starving artist" cliches and those stale
post-modern (ie: "dead") moralistic orthodoxies of "hi-lo" culture... okay,
back to work; wake me when it's over.
On 12/19/05, Pall Thayer <p_thay@alcor.concordia.ca> wrote:
>
> >
> > There are worse jobs in the world than being a Pixar animator, and
> > if that is what someone wants to do, then good luck to them, maybe
> > they'll be contributing to another enjoyable pixar film, and/or
> > gain some technical knowledge and do something hip and subversive
> > on their own time....
>
> Comments like this always get to me. Being an artist isn't something
> that you do "on [your] own time". It's a full-time job. It's not a
> hobby. Sometimes artists need a job on the side to pay the bills but
> being an artist takes a lot of devotion. Devotion that you're not
> going to muster if you're working a pion 8 am to 10 pm job at Pixar.
> Sure, if that's what you want, go for it. But don't fool yourself
> into thinking that you're going to be able to have a meaningful art
> practice on the side.
>
> Pall
>
> >
> > just my 2 cents worth.
>
> Sorry, but to me that comment dropped the worth to zilch.
>
> >
> > Zev
> >
> > Zev Robinson
> > www.artafterscience.com
> > www.zrdesign.co.uk
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "mark cooley" <flawedart@yahoo.com>
> > To: <list@rhizome.org>
> > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 5:50 AM
> > Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: The sadness of the dream of Pixar.
> >
> >
> >> i'm sympathetic with the view that students are shortchanging
> >> themselves. it's nice to see patrick sum up a lot of the
> >> frustrations i have as a teacher, and sad to see that the pixar
> >> flu is an epidemic (one would like to think that it's only at
> >> one's own school and the grass is somehow greener, or a little
> >> less well rendered at least, somewhere else). i do think that it
> >> is important not to revert to modernist assumptions of high and
> >> low art and to judge Pixaritis on such a basis (although it is
> >> tempting at times). that's why i'm happy to see that patrick
> >> commenting on the mythologies of success (in pixar terms) and why
> >> it might not be in the student's best interest (regardless of the
> >> hype) to even think twice about working as a human machine for
> >> someone elses profit. The sad fact is that many art students
> >> don't care about being artists and much of my time in the
> >> classroom is spent assuming that they do want to be artists.
> >> hence, the frustration.
> >>
> >> mark
> >>
> >>
> >> patrick lichty wrote:
> >>
> >>> My colleagues and I went to see Chronicles of Narnia last night,
> >>> and I
> >>> thought more about this converstation.
> >>>
> >>> The sadness of all this is that the students are aspiring to be
> >>> people
> >>> who create someone else's vision.
> >>>
> >>> This is what I feel is the tragedy of it all. To me, being an
> >>> artist
> >>> is
> >>> about generating your own ideas, vision, etc. It isn't about
> >>> realizing
> >>> someone else's. I'm not talking about the Modernist view of the
> >>> artist-as-genius, but I am talking about the functional difference
> >>> between being a generator of ideas and merely an agent of
> >>> realization.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> One requires a lot more thought than the other.
> >>>
> >>> In the US, kids are taught to want to learn just what they need to
> >>> know
> >>> to get a job. This is where Postman was so right about Technopoly.
> >>> Results-based learning gears expectations to be complacent with the
> >>> pigeonhole, more or less. The problem is that they don't tell the
> >>> kids
> >>> that the pigeonhole could be eliminated by outsourcing, market
> >>> pressures, or any number of factors that could cause a bottom-line
> >>> conscious corporation to 'shift its human resource requirements' for
> >>> any
> >>> number of reasons, including the hiring of more creative people from
> >>> global labor pools in the future. The dream of Pixar is short term,
> >>> in
> >>> tems of the students.
> >>>
> >>> Some will say that the idea is to get them into industry so they can
> >>> start getting experience so they can rise to the point where they
> >>> can
> >>> have creative freedom.
> >>>
> >>> I understand we all have to eat. However, then why the hell are you
> >>> going to art school? To merely master a set of perceptual and
> >>> realization skills so you can actualize them LATER? This makes no
> >>> sense
> >>> to me. Why are you going to an art school than going to a technical
> >>> school?
> >>>
> >>> Therefore:
> >>> The dream of Pixar:
> >>> 1: Short-term
> >>> 2: Driven by corporate entertainment media cash
> >>> 3: Results-driven (productivity of 'creative' entertainment media
> >>> that
> >>> judges its merit on market success)
> >>> 4: short-changes the individuality/vision of the artist,
> >>> 5: Subjugates students to an unstable/uncertain corporate media
> >>> production paradigm.
> >>> 6: Is intellectually bereft / discourages critical engagement /
> >>> discourages thought/reflection to emphasize entertainment.
> >>> 7: Is elitist as a high art paradigm, but Pixar's elitism is
> >>> driven by
> >>> the industrial/entertainment sector, not high culture. You still
> >>> have
> >>> to have the same sorts of levels of validation, which are also
> >>> extremely
> >>> hard to pass.
> >>>
> >>> It's as if the students were going to extraordinary lengths not to
> >>> think, when they might actually find it easier to do so.
> >>>
> >>> Pick your poison.
> >>>
> >>> I can come up with a few more, I'm sure.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> +
> >> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> >> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> >> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/
> >> subscribe.rhiz
> >> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> >> +
> >> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> >> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/
> >> 29.php
> >
> > +
> > -> post: list@rhizome.org
> > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/
> > subscribe.rhiz
> > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> > +
> > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/
> > 29.php
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Pall Thayer
> p_thay@alcor.concordia.ca
> http://www.this.is/pallit
>
>
>
>
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
Re: Yahoo buys... everything
Ahh! thanks reBlog:
December 13, 2005
Yahoo! Partners with Six Apart to Distribute Movable
Type<http://rss.weblogsinc.com/entry/1234000253072202/>
Yahoo! has agreed<http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051212/wr_nm/media_yahoo_blo=
gs_dc_1>to
provide Movable Type as the default blogging solution in its extensive
small-business suite of services. The other hand will get washed as parent
company Six Apart directs small-business traffic to Yahoo! for a complete
ISP/merchant/blogging package. There's nothing new about Web-hosting
accounts with Movable Type pre-installed; the Movable Type site has a
recommendation
page <http://www.sixapart.com/partners/current> for such services, to which
Yahoo! has not been added.
Of course, Yahoo! provides a newbie-friendly blogging experience with Yahoo!
360, which could possibly be interpreted as competition to the much more
established (and feature-rich) Blogger. But Six Apart's three platform
levels (Movable Type, TypePad, and Live Journal) cover all the bases and
could vault Yahoo! into a whole new position in the blogging wars.
Originally <http://rss.weblogsinc.com/entry/1234000253072202/> posted by
Brad Hill from The RSS Weblog <http://rss.weblogsinc.com/>, ReBlogged by EAI
on Dec 13, 2005 at 12:58
AM<http://www.eyebeam.org/reblog/archives/2005/12/yahoo_partners_with_six_a=
part_to.html>
On 12/13/05, Geert Dekkers <geert@nznl.com> wrote:
>
> distribute Movable Type <http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/> , my
> favorite blogging tool.
>
>
>
> What does "distrubute" mean in this context. It doesn't mean "own" does
> it?
> The sixapart crew is reaaaally cute. Have you read the blurb about how it
> all got started? Great marketing. Great, because its probably true....
>
> (I'm a huge movable type fan)
>
> Geert
> http://nznl.com
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2005, at 4:31 PM, <joy.garnett@gmail.com> <
> joy.garnett@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> *just posted:
> http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html
> *
>
> *
> via Library Crunch<http://www.librarycrunch.com/2005/12/yahoo_buys_into_w=
eb_20.html>,
> 12/12/05*:
>
> *Yahoo / Flickr / Del.icio.us / Movable Type*
>
> Yahoo <http://www.yahoo.com/> is on a Web 2.0 buying spree. Having
> already acquired Flickr <http://flickr.com/photos/michaelcasey/>, my
> favorite photo-sharing website, earlier this year, just this past weekend
> they announced the purchase of Del.icio.us <http://del.icio.us/>, my
> favorite social bookmarking site, and they revealed their plans to
> distribute Movable Type <http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/> , my
> favorite blogging tool.
>
> December 12, 2005 at 10:27 AM in Current Affairs<http://newsgrist.typepad=
.com/underbelly/current_affairs/index.html>,
> Web/Tech <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/webtech/index.html>,
> Weblogs <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/weblogs/index.html> |
> Permalink<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever=
.html>| Comments
> (0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#=
comments>| TrackBack
> (0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#=
trackback>
>
>
>
December 13, 2005
Yahoo! Partners with Six Apart to Distribute Movable
Type<http://rss.weblogsinc.com/entry/1234000253072202/>
Yahoo! has agreed<http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051212/wr_nm/media_yahoo_blo=
gs_dc_1>to
provide Movable Type as the default blogging solution in its extensive
small-business suite of services. The other hand will get washed as parent
company Six Apart directs small-business traffic to Yahoo! for a complete
ISP/merchant/blogging package. There's nothing new about Web-hosting
accounts with Movable Type pre-installed; the Movable Type site has a
recommendation
page <http://www.sixapart.com/partners/current> for such services, to which
Yahoo! has not been added.
Of course, Yahoo! provides a newbie-friendly blogging experience with Yahoo!
360, which could possibly be interpreted as competition to the much more
established (and feature-rich) Blogger. But Six Apart's three platform
levels (Movable Type, TypePad, and Live Journal) cover all the bases and
could vault Yahoo! into a whole new position in the blogging wars.
Originally <http://rss.weblogsinc.com/entry/1234000253072202/> posted by
Brad Hill from The RSS Weblog <http://rss.weblogsinc.com/>, ReBlogged by EAI
on Dec 13, 2005 at 12:58
AM<http://www.eyebeam.org/reblog/archives/2005/12/yahoo_partners_with_six_a=
part_to.html>
On 12/13/05, Geert Dekkers <geert@nznl.com> wrote:
>
> distribute Movable Type <http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/> , my
> favorite blogging tool.
>
>
>
> What does "distrubute" mean in this context. It doesn't mean "own" does
> it?
> The sixapart crew is reaaaally cute. Have you read the blurb about how it
> all got started? Great marketing. Great, because its probably true....
>
> (I'm a huge movable type fan)
>
> Geert
> http://nznl.com
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2005, at 4:31 PM, <joy.garnett@gmail.com> <
> joy.garnett@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> *just posted:
> http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html
> *
>
> *
> via Library Crunch<http://www.librarycrunch.com/2005/12/yahoo_buys_into_w=
eb_20.html>,
> 12/12/05*:
>
> *Yahoo / Flickr / Del.icio.us / Movable Type*
>
> Yahoo <http://www.yahoo.com/> is on a Web 2.0 buying spree. Having
> already acquired Flickr <http://flickr.com/photos/michaelcasey/>, my
> favorite photo-sharing website, earlier this year, just this past weekend
> they announced the purchase of Del.icio.us <http://del.icio.us/>, my
> favorite social bookmarking site, and they revealed their plans to
> distribute Movable Type <http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/> , my
> favorite blogging tool.
>
> December 12, 2005 at 10:27 AM in Current Affairs<http://newsgrist.typepad=
.com/underbelly/current_affairs/index.html>,
> Web/Tech <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/webtech/index.html>,
> Weblogs <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/weblogs/index.html> |
> Permalink<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever=
.html>| Comments
> (0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#=
comments>| TrackBack
> (0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#=
trackback>
>
>
>
Re: Yahoo buys... everything
moi aussi -- love them. but yeah, what on earth is 'distribute' ?
On 12/13/05, Geert Dekkers <geert@nznl.com> wrote:
>
> distribute Movable Type <http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/> , my
> favorite blogging tool.
>
>
>
> What does "distrubute" mean in this context. It doesn't mean "own" does
> it?
> The sixapart crew is reaaaally cute. Have you read the blurb about how it
> all got started? Great marketing. Great, because its probably true....
>
> (I'm a huge movable type fan)
>
> Geert
> http://nznl.com
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2005, at 4:31 PM, <joy.garnett@gmail.com> <
> joy.garnett@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> *just posted:
> http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html
> *
>
> *
> via Library Crunch<http://www.librarycrunch.com/2005/12/yahoo_buys_into_w=
eb_20.html>,
> 12/12/05*:
>
> *Yahoo / Flickr / Del.icio.us / Movable Type*
>
> Yahoo <http://www.yahoo.com/> is on a Web 2.0 buying spree. Having
> already acquired Flickr <http://flickr.com/photos/michaelcasey/>, my
> favorite photo-sharing website, earlier this year, just this past weekend
> they announced the purchase of Del.icio.us <http://del.icio.us/>, my
> favorite social bookmarking site, and they revealed their plans to
> distribute Movable Type <http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/> , my
> favorite blogging tool.
>
> December 12, 2005 at 10:27 AM in Current Affairs<http://newsgrist.typepad=
.com/underbelly/current_affairs/index.html>,
> Web/Tech <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/webtech/index.html>,
> Weblogs <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/weblogs/index.html> |
> Permalink<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever=
.html>| Comments
> (0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#=
comments>| TrackBack
> (0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#=
trackback>
>
>
>
On 12/13/05, Geert Dekkers <geert@nznl.com> wrote:
>
> distribute Movable Type <http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/> , my
> favorite blogging tool.
>
>
>
> What does "distrubute" mean in this context. It doesn't mean "own" does
> it?
> The sixapart crew is reaaaally cute. Have you read the blurb about how it
> all got started? Great marketing. Great, because its probably true....
>
> (I'm a huge movable type fan)
>
> Geert
> http://nznl.com
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2005, at 4:31 PM, <joy.garnett@gmail.com> <
> joy.garnett@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> *just posted:
> http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html
> *
>
> *
> via Library Crunch<http://www.librarycrunch.com/2005/12/yahoo_buys_into_w=
eb_20.html>,
> 12/12/05*:
>
> *Yahoo / Flickr / Del.icio.us / Movable Type*
>
> Yahoo <http://www.yahoo.com/> is on a Web 2.0 buying spree. Having
> already acquired Flickr <http://flickr.com/photos/michaelcasey/>, my
> favorite photo-sharing website, earlier this year, just this past weekend
> they announced the purchase of Del.icio.us <http://del.icio.us/>, my
> favorite social bookmarking site, and they revealed their plans to
> distribute Movable Type <http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/> , my
> favorite blogging tool.
>
> December 12, 2005 at 10:27 AM in Current Affairs<http://newsgrist.typepad=
.com/underbelly/current_affairs/index.html>,
> Web/Tech <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/webtech/index.html>,
> Weblogs <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/weblogs/index.html> |
> Permalink<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever=
.html>| Comments
> (0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#=
comments>| TrackBack
> (0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#=
trackback>
>
>
>
Yahoo buys... everything
*just posted:
http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html
*
*
via Library Crunch<http://www.librarycrunch.com/2005/12/yahoo_buys_into_web=
_20.html>,
12/12/05*:
*Yahoo / Flickr / Del.icio.us / Movable Type*
Yahoo <http://www.yahoo.com/> is on a Web 2.0 buying spree. Having already
acquired Flickr <http://flickr.com/photos/michaelcasey/>, my favorite
photo-sharing website, earlier this year, just this past weekend they
announced the purchase of Del.icio.us <http://del.icio.us/>, my favorite
social bookmarking site, and they revealed their plans to distribute Movable
Type <http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/>, my favorite blogging tool.
December 12, 2005 at 10:27 AM in Current
Affairs<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/current_affairs/index.html>,
Web/Tech <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/webtech/index.html>,
Weblogs <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/weblogs/index.html> |
Permalink<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.h=
tml>|
Comments
(0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#co=
mments>|
TrackBack
(0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#tr=
ackback>
http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html
*
*
via Library Crunch<http://www.librarycrunch.com/2005/12/yahoo_buys_into_web=
_20.html>,
12/12/05*:
*Yahoo / Flickr / Del.icio.us / Movable Type*
Yahoo <http://www.yahoo.com/> is on a Web 2.0 buying spree. Having already
acquired Flickr <http://flickr.com/photos/michaelcasey/>, my favorite
photo-sharing website, earlier this year, just this past weekend they
announced the purchase of Del.icio.us <http://del.icio.us/>, my favorite
social bookmarking site, and they revealed their plans to distribute Movable
Type <http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/>, my favorite blogging tool.
December 12, 2005 at 10:27 AM in Current
Affairs<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/current_affairs/index.html>,
Web/Tech <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/webtech/index.html>,
Weblogs <http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/weblogs/index.html> |
Permalink<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.h=
tml>|
Comments
(0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#co=
mments>|
TrackBack
(0)<http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2005/12/yahoo_buys_ever.html#tr=
ackback>
Fwd: Brennan Center's Fair Use report is out - Please post!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marjorie Heins <HEINSM@juris.law.nyu.edu>
Date: Dec 5, 2005 11:09 AM
Subject: Brennan Center's Fair Use report is out - Please post!
To: Neema Trivedi <trivedi@juris.law.nyu.edu>
Dear Friends & Colleagues,
The Brennan Center for Justice is pleased to announce the release of our
report, "Will Fair Use Survive? Free Expression in the Age of Copyright
Control." An e-version is now available online. We'd be grateful if you
could post notice of the report on your Web sites, blogs, listservs, and
e-newsletters. Here is some language you can use (of course, feel free to
edit, or write your own posting):
"Will Fair Use Survive? Free Expression in the Age of Copyright Control"
- from the Free Expression Policy Project at the Brennan Center for Justice,
NYU School of Law
http://www.fepproject.org/policyreports/WillFairUseSurvive.pdf
The result of more than a year of research -- including many firsthand
stories from artists, historians, Web bloggers, and others -- "Will Fair Use
Survive?" documents how the rights to fair use and free expression are being
threatened by an intellectual property system that is perilously out of
balance. The report includes six recommendations for change. Documentary
filmmaker of "Hoop Dreams," Gordon Quinn, proclaims that the report "is part
of a wider movement to educate people about fair use, and it's going to help
us users organize and reassert the right to fair use." For printed copies,
email kafayat@nyu.edu
Thanks,
Marjorie
Marjorie Heins
Brennan Center for Justice
Free Expression Policy Project
161 Avenue of the Americas, 12th fl.
New York, NY 10013
212 992-8847
marjorie.heins@nyu.edu
www.fepproject.org
From: Marjorie Heins <HEINSM@juris.law.nyu.edu>
Date: Dec 5, 2005 11:09 AM
Subject: Brennan Center's Fair Use report is out - Please post!
To: Neema Trivedi <trivedi@juris.law.nyu.edu>
Dear Friends & Colleagues,
The Brennan Center for Justice is pleased to announce the release of our
report, "Will Fair Use Survive? Free Expression in the Age of Copyright
Control." An e-version is now available online. We'd be grateful if you
could post notice of the report on your Web sites, blogs, listservs, and
e-newsletters. Here is some language you can use (of course, feel free to
edit, or write your own posting):
"Will Fair Use Survive? Free Expression in the Age of Copyright Control"
- from the Free Expression Policy Project at the Brennan Center for Justice,
NYU School of Law
http://www.fepproject.org/policyreports/WillFairUseSurvive.pdf
The result of more than a year of research -- including many firsthand
stories from artists, historians, Web bloggers, and others -- "Will Fair Use
Survive?" documents how the rights to fair use and free expression are being
threatened by an intellectual property system that is perilously out of
balance. The report includes six recommendations for change. Documentary
filmmaker of "Hoop Dreams," Gordon Quinn, proclaims that the report "is part
of a wider movement to educate people about fair use, and it's going to help
us users organize and reassert the right to fair use." For printed copies,
email kafayat@nyu.edu
Thanks,
Marjorie
Marjorie Heins
Brennan Center for Justice
Free Expression Policy Project
161 Avenue of the Americas, 12th fl.
New York, NY 10013
212 992-8847
marjorie.heins@nyu.edu
www.fepproject.org