n.a.
BIO
re 12 hr ISBN
thanks for reminding people how the current histories of internet art are woefully incorrect, incomplete and self-serving.
censorship and internet2
to put it simply,
if Internet2 requires RSS feeds, and these feeds are scanned, then censorship becomes a reality.
should you support RSS?
no,
just by forward thinking this is a source of problems.
but i am being blasphemous through discussion.
Eric
if Internet2 requires RSS feeds, and these feeds are scanned, then censorship becomes a reality.
should you support RSS?
no,
just by forward thinking this is a source of problems.
but i am being blasphemous through discussion.
Eric
Re: Re: Re: Internet2: Orchestrating the End of the Internet?
Sorry if I recoup the other response.
The semantic Web, which defines the rules of Internet2 do not exclude criticism or debate.
To misconstrue a technology this way is irresponsible.
Control is no more on the horizon in a semantically connected web than a differentiated, distorted network that we now call internet 1.
Connecting and disseminating discourse should be easier and more pointed in Internet2.
Before you judge, please read the ww3.org standard for the new Internet.
That said, it will be easier for providers to filter information with the new standards, thats not even up for debate. If you have even a basic understanding of programming this is obvious.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
we will be posting an artist friendly version this May.
Eric
The semantic Web, which defines the rules of Internet2 do not exclude criticism or debate.
To misconstrue a technology this way is irresponsible.
Control is no more on the horizon in a semantically connected web than a differentiated, distorted network that we now call internet 1.
Connecting and disseminating discourse should be easier and more pointed in Internet2.
Before you judge, please read the ww3.org standard for the new Internet.
That said, it will be easier for providers to filter information with the new standards, thats not even up for debate. If you have even a basic understanding of programming this is obvious.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
we will be posting an artist friendly version this May.
Eric
Drinking expensive Scotch
well some things are just self explanatory.
If my subject is true, what am I doing here? writing a message to a listserv?
my God, this is sad, i may kill myself over this.
but wait..., the Bowmores awaits,
back in a drink or 3
God Bless George Bush!
If my subject is true, what am I doing here? writing a message to a listserv?
my God, this is sad, i may kill myself over this.
but wait..., the Bowmores awaits,
back in a drink or 3
God Bless George Bush!
Re: Re: yet even More Artstar
Jason Van Anden wrote:
> Was everyone else on line last Monday?
no, first I have heard of it.
>
> Jo-Anne Green wrote:
> http://www.test.org.uk/archives/002373.html
a url, what a crazy idea
>
> This appears to suggest that Artstar might not be exploitive because
> Kartoon Kings are involved. Of the cast of characters (listed below)
> it seems that they would be the only artists in the pecking order that
> have an opportunity to "wrest control of the artworld's economic
> hierarchy" - kinda.
can I have some of that power? my retirement savings plan is looking a little weak right now.
>
> Artstar Pecking Order:
> 1.) Collectors with $ to burn who also watch TV
> 2.) Deitch Projects
> 3.) Kartoon Kings
> 4.) Artists (non-self respecting, clearly not from 70's)
Those bastards, hoe dare they exist in the same time frame as us!!!
>
> Why not have an art realty tv show loosely based on "Joe Millionaire"
> where out of a pool of eligible gallery directors one will be selected
> for a chance to marry an incredibly wealthy collector?
well, marrying is a little too much. I mean really darling, would you consider marrying me, i doubut it.
>
> Self-respecting artists of the 00s unite!
none of us have any respect. My god dear, we can barely hold ourselves up at the bar!
>
> Jason Van Anden
Eric Dymond
> Was everyone else on line last Monday?
no, first I have heard of it.
>
> Jo-Anne Green wrote:
> http://www.test.org.uk/archives/002373.html
a url, what a crazy idea
>
> This appears to suggest that Artstar might not be exploitive because
> Kartoon Kings are involved. Of the cast of characters (listed below)
> it seems that they would be the only artists in the pecking order that
> have an opportunity to "wrest control of the artworld's economic
> hierarchy" - kinda.
can I have some of that power? my retirement savings plan is looking a little weak right now.
>
> Artstar Pecking Order:
> 1.) Collectors with $ to burn who also watch TV
> 2.) Deitch Projects
> 3.) Kartoon Kings
> 4.) Artists (non-self respecting, clearly not from 70's)
Those bastards, hoe dare they exist in the same time frame as us!!!
>
> Why not have an art realty tv show loosely based on "Joe Millionaire"
> where out of a pool of eligible gallery directors one will be selected
> for a chance to marry an incredibly wealthy collector?
well, marrying is a little too much. I mean really darling, would you consider marrying me, i doubut it.
>
> Self-respecting artists of the 00s unite!
none of us have any respect. My god dear, we can barely hold ourselves up at the bar!
>
> Jason Van Anden
Eric Dymond