big brother is coming
o CNET: Berman to Revise Controversial P2P Hacking Bill for Next Congress
Washington -- A controversial bill that would allow entertainment
companies to hack into peer-to-peer file-sharing networks and use
technological countermeasures to combat the free trade of their
copyrighted works will be revised before it is reintroduced in the next
Congressional session, CNET News.com reported on Wednesday. Rep. Howard
Berman's (D-Ca.) P2P Piracy Prevention Act drew ire from consumer groups
and technology firms including the Consumer Electronics Association when
it was introduced. "[Berman] plans to significantly redraft the bill to
accommodate reasonable concerns before reintroduction in the 108th
(Congress)," said Alec French, an aide to Rep. Berman. News.com reported
that French also said Berman "welcomes suggestions" on how to address
objections to the bill while maintaining its intended goal.
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-963087.html?tag=cd_mh
http://www.house.gov/berman/pr072502.htm
Washington -- A controversial bill that would allow entertainment
companies to hack into peer-to-peer file-sharing networks and use
technological countermeasures to combat the free trade of their
copyrighted works will be revised before it is reintroduced in the next
Congressional session, CNET News.com reported on Wednesday. Rep. Howard
Berman's (D-Ca.) P2P Piracy Prevention Act drew ire from consumer groups
and technology firms including the Consumer Electronics Association when
it was introduced. "[Berman] plans to significantly redraft the bill to
accommodate reasonable concerns before reintroduction in the 108th
(Congress)," said Alec French, an aide to Rep. Berman. News.com reported
that French also said Berman "welcomes suggestions" on how to address
objections to the bill while maintaining its intended goal.
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-963087.html?tag=cd_mh
http://www.house.gov/berman/pr072502.htm
karei, karei quite contrary
no K A R E I ... you are not on the "right track". at least, not for me.
your expedient means [online persona] may work for others but i doubt you
and i will never understand one another.
there are about six billion humans on Earth and you see each human as
thoroughly unique [yet] you treat/engage each one the same
there are about six billion humans on Earth and I see that we are all
essentially the same [yet] i treat/engage each individually
i do not know if one way is better than the other (i don' t think its a
"right" or "wrong" choice) however, your perspective/approach and mine are
not compatible.
your recitations on "ego" and "self" reveal you for the thief that you are.
stop stealing from eastern philosophers. you are not capable of properly
repeating their ideas.
btw - you should see a therapist about that mesiah complex (and yes, i can
tell you what to do).
david goldschmidt
----- Original Message -----
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
To: <list@rhizome.org>
Cc: <thingist@BBS.THING.NET>
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 12:13 AM
>
> Q: But if my ego is full of ignorance, what decisive answer can it
> give to me?
> R: Now we are on the right track. Ego is ignorance (of the mind), while
> the Self is Knowledge; therefore you must look for the Self. (+ no
> teacher can 'give' you anything).
>
> Q: And how do I find the Self? As you can see, we are going back to the
> original question.
> R: By dying to ignorance. And how can you die to ignorance, if ignorance
> is always chattering away and biting its own tail? No correct and fair
> answer can come from an ego that is ignorant. If we wish to stand
> still while we are walking, what should we do?
> Q: We should stop, stand still, stop walking.
> R: Very good. So why dont you stop and stand still? Why don't you nail
> down your mind-ignorance to silence ?
>
> (+ the original 'teaching' of the crucifiction was the 'nailing'
> of the ego
> + nobody can do that to or for anyone else
> + it cannot be accomplished in public, not in performance,
> not in mailing lists, not anywhere besides within the
> confines + solitude of a human body)
>
> `, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
>
> + perplex propaganda subtile invasion ???
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
your expedient means [online persona] may work for others but i doubt you
and i will never understand one another.
there are about six billion humans on Earth and you see each human as
thoroughly unique [yet] you treat/engage each one the same
there are about six billion humans on Earth and I see that we are all
essentially the same [yet] i treat/engage each individually
i do not know if one way is better than the other (i don' t think its a
"right" or "wrong" choice) however, your perspective/approach and mine are
not compatible.
your recitations on "ego" and "self" reveal you for the thief that you are.
stop stealing from eastern philosophers. you are not capable of properly
repeating their ideas.
btw - you should see a therapist about that mesiah complex (and yes, i can
tell you what to do).
david goldschmidt
----- Original Message -----
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
To: <list@rhizome.org>
Cc: <thingist@BBS.THING.NET>
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 12:13 AM
>
> Q: But if my ego is full of ignorance, what decisive answer can it
> give to me?
> R: Now we are on the right track. Ego is ignorance (of the mind), while
> the Self is Knowledge; therefore you must look for the Self. (+ no
> teacher can 'give' you anything).
>
> Q: And how do I find the Self? As you can see, we are going back to the
> original question.
> R: By dying to ignorance. And how can you die to ignorance, if ignorance
> is always chattering away and biting its own tail? No correct and fair
> answer can come from an ego that is ignorant. If we wish to stand
> still while we are walking, what should we do?
> Q: We should stop, stand still, stop walking.
> R: Very good. So why dont you stop and stand still? Why don't you nail
> down your mind-ignorance to silence ?
>
> (+ the original 'teaching' of the crucifiction was the 'nailing'
> of the ego
> + nobody can do that to or for anyone else
> + it cannot be accomplished in public, not in performance,
> not in mailing lists, not anywhere besides within the
> confines + solitude of a human body)
>
> `, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
>
> + perplex propaganda subtile invasion ???
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
Re: Joseph the Mountaian Sensei-Master
i am myself
online and offline
you fear revealing your [true] self in public (and YOU should). i strongly
advise you to keep your mask ON becasue if anyone ever met your [true] self
... they'd beat the fuck out of you.
you are a coward
david goldchmidt
----- Original Message -----
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
To: "David Goldschmidt" <david@personify.tv>
Cc: <list@rhizome.org>; <thingist@BBS.THING.NET>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Joseph the Mountaian Sensei-Master
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, David Goldschmidt wrote:
> > how sad that you must wear a mask in public ... you are a coward and you
> > live in fear.
>
> There is nothing 'sad' or 'cowardly' about wearing masks.
> Masks are a proper funmction of the human being.
> You are in fact wearing one as you speak.
> Your obliviousness of it--now that cold be considered 'sad'.
>
>
online and offline
you fear revealing your [true] self in public (and YOU should). i strongly
advise you to keep your mask ON becasue if anyone ever met your [true] self
... they'd beat the fuck out of you.
you are a coward
david goldchmidt
----- Original Message -----
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
To: "David Goldschmidt" <david@personify.tv>
Cc: <list@rhizome.org>; <thingist@BBS.THING.NET>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Joseph the Mountaian Sensei-Master
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, David Goldschmidt wrote:
> > how sad that you must wear a mask in public ... you are a coward and you
> > live in fear.
>
> There is nothing 'sad' or 'cowardly' about wearing masks.
> Masks are a proper funmction of the human being.
> You are in fact wearing one as you speak.
> Your obliviousness of it--now that cold be considered 'sad'.
>
>
Re: Joseph the Mountaian Sensei-Master
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, David Goldschmidt wrote:
>
> > how sad that you must wear a mask in public ... you are a coward and you
> > live in fear.
>
Karei wrote
> addendum:
you are not capable of having a second thought
david goldschmidt
>
> > how sad that you must wear a mask in public ... you are a coward and you
> > live in fear.
>
Karei wrote
> addendum:
you are not capable of having a second thought
david goldschmidt
Re: Joseph the Mountaian Sensei-Master
karei wrote
> 'Mountain' state is 'symbolic' of a zen-master state, that is one who has
> conquered himself, all of his weaknesses and self-delusions, and has
> overcome his human-ness.
>
being human is not a flaw. humans are perfectly human.
the goal is enlightenment.
the goal is NOT a state of inhumaness, un-human, post human (or whatever it
is you think you are)
stop appropriating eastern philosophy. you are not qualified to interpret
or teach anything you may have [mis]read.
david goldschmidt
> Dogen you are not.
>
> In fact Joseph's life-force is very small. He's rigid, inflexible, and
> brutish. Secondly, Joseph lacks proper capability to orgasm which is
> standard of asleep sexual force, and without such awakening there is no
> development to a state of fluid, conscious and vital ki.
>
> His idiotic and psychotic wishful thinking about my 'fear and hatred' of
> him is little but the tactic of a cowardly dog who lacks power, and who
> thinks that mental tricks would psyche-out his opponent, paired with
> spasmodic twitching, and attempts to salvage his self-importance in
> public. Nevermind that he fancies himself a percieved 'enemy'--even though
> it has been made abundantly clear that nobody is attacking him.
>
> The depiction of his state is simply a 'portrait'--and I paint it as is.
>
> I neither like nor dislike Joseph, yet he's a useful example of the kind
> of idiot who damages others, and who is unfortunately become the udulated
> 'hero' in the face of disappearance of proper spiritual traditions.
>
> The other point of the portrait is this: that this kind of behavior is not
> powerful, not knowledgeable, and not life. It is the behavior of a man who
> is impotent to PERCEIVE so he must claw at the 'masks' of others. The
> realization that one wears a mask is certainly one of the first steps
> to conscious evolution. The next step is not 'dropping the mask and baring
> your soul' however, and this psychotic trend is completely stupid.
>
> The world proper (not human) is not short in Beings who'd love to feed
> on human essense-energy (as it is one of the: purest energies), and one
> is not given this essence so one may piss it away. The 'mask' is a
> necessity--and the proper form of evolution is to SEE behind the mask
> (which is quite feasible), for those for whom this is possible.
>
> For the REST the soul which each human carries is to remain HIDDEN.
> Nobody owes anybody to reveal, show and otherwise make available its
> soul or any part of itself. It is a personal and private business. For
> that matter, nobody owes not anybody ELSE not a whit of their privacy at
> all. AT ALL.
>
> When a human chooses to appear in public, in a responsible manner, it is
> up to the individual human to determine how, to what extent, in what
> manner, and how much of itself it is to reveal. In a situation of
> responsible adults, anyone else would naturally simply feel honored
> and blessed at another's presence--in whatever 'minimal' form it may be.
>
> Critique is idiotic nonsense. One can either assist or not assist.
> Those who can assist are very few--and while I'm not indicating
> discouragement of seeking assistance, advice, help or conversations,
> this posing of *I'm a shaman' *I'm influenced by Sufism* etc etc.
> is drivel. One is neither a shaman, nor a sufi, nor a gnostic christian,
> nor any of this stuff being thrown around if one is a. not awakened b.
> not in direct contact with a 'school' or 'teacher' who is transmitting
> energetic material (and Im not implying human teachers necessarily).
>
> All else is kaput. Wishes, fantasies. 'Dreams'. While i am also not
> discouraging anyone to pursue such interests, the achievement of such
> 'titles' are not trivial. They area pplicable to beings who HAVE done
> work, who ARE awake / evolved, not just to any idiot who is 'fascinated
> by' for whatever reasons-career, he saw another monkey do it,
> self-aggrandizement, etc.
>
> On the subjects of 'power' and 'knowledge' and Truth--they certainly
> exist in an absolute sense, in fact your average human's 'existence'
> is far more emphimeral than those. The reactionary knee-jerkisms
> to the former two are thproughly revealing of many of the posters
> egotistical, diseases, jealous, self-important natures, as well as of your
> pathetic ignorance on such matters and their true nature.
>
> Neither power nor knowledge are made available to egotistical
> self-important twits who 'cling' to them as if they're property.
> Power in particular would destroy any such imbecile.
>
> Secondly, vital energy, vital strength and self-discipline are
> a life-necessity for all humans. This is not brute force. This is not
> aggression. Refusal to tolerate crap is not a 'clenched fist'--
> never has been, nor will it be. The cultivation of ki in whatever form (I
> am not advocating all run out and become japanese / chinese) is VITAL.
>
> On THESE lists what the majority of posters do is debase others,
> attempt to constrict and cut off ki circulation, and cripple any
> human unfortunate enough to has started any sort of development.
> This is all passed on under the guise of 'dialogue' 'discourse'
> 'critique' and hell--'performance art'.
>
> A very large section of posters 'stay quiet' or form little 'elite groups'
> where they stick together and defend each other, huddled in their sleep.
> Rather the opposite of david blah's post, my presence can only be
> threatening to idiots who want to pretend that they are 'important'
> things they are not. And by the way his plea for anycopyright because he
> wants to deface corporate logos, is driven by the same impulse that
> causes one to 'claw' at masks--he wants appropriation of power that is not
> his. Logos are in many aspects derived from 'shields' 'crests' and various
> other similar 'masking' devices, and the REAL IMPULSE is to shatter the
> shield. This is all good and fine if it were directed towards 'the
> narcissistic mirror of self-reflection,' but in ever is. Cause the problem
> is never with ONE, it's always somebody else's fault. Nevermind that this
> gets transferred to the reproductive / fucking impulses and women are
> forthe most part 'shields' or mirrors, so this murderous impulse gets
> transferred to them.
>
> Sanity is not expected however.
>
> The kind of 'honesty' that you attempt to preach does not exist.
> It's merely an attempt to SLOT humans and tag them with an easy label.
> The pathetic weakness of an ape who cannot deal with reality, and seeks
> security, which in turn manifests as psychotic control mechanisms.
>
> What you want is not HONESTY. You want a flat, simple, predictable,
> familiar IDENTITY with which the human is to IDENTIFY WITH. *Oh him
> / her*. The figured out human. The one with the 'personal quirks and
> weaknesses' that somehow make him / her appear less threatening.
> Certainly NOT one who doesn't HAVE any because that'll be a reminder
> of your own state, and that one must work to overcome these things,
> not pretend that they're ornamental jewelry. A weak and 'quirky'
> human is controllable. Safe. Asleep. A strong, aware nd conscious
> Being is not 'predictable'. Not 'controllable'. Never twice the same.
> Never familiar. Connected to the source of knowledge, and to degrees
> available to its being omniscient. Autonomous. And among other things
> free. But that is not 'interesting'. A human victim twitching in its
> trap--be it anger, or making a mistake due to sleep-state, attachment
> and preferably DYING etc. is FAR MORE INTERESTING. Far from artistic
> sensibility, intelligence, and talent, this kind of behavior is informed
> by idiotic stupor and a morbid sado-masochistic pornographic murder
> impulse. This does not come from one capable of genuinely enjoying Self,
> Life, and others, and capable of creation.
>
> The reality of the matter is that in FACT I am not wearing a mask in this
> situation because I am capable of doing so in public for some periods of
> time and protecting myself. What you are SCREAMINg about is that I AM NOT
> A MASK. Because were I A MASK, and IDENTITY, you would know how to relate.
> You'd know which holes to look for, and which buttons to push. What makes
> 'me' tick. The truly sad thing is that your so-elated 'human' contacts
> are rarely joyous. You always seek to relate to another through its
> 'weakness' or 'pain'--and when you don't find any you're BENT on hurting
> the other human in order to 'teach life'. Some of you even have the gal to
> claim that they engage in this sadism 'out of compassion (Max Herman,
> Peter von Brandenburg).' Compassion is the ability to transform another's
> pain into 'love'--that is to heal. This is available to awakened
> individuals mostly as well, although I've had the pleasure of encoyntering
> some who doit unconsciously due to 'special' forces working through them.
> Slapping people around like a butcher with flat stereotypical projections
> is not 'compassionate'. Not only that but it strengthens the 'human'
> masochistic impulse (hit me, I deserve it).
>
> As is, when writing to 'me', you're screaming at a void, and projecting
> all sort of imnecilities. You are not trying to UNMASK me. You are trying
> to DICTATE A MASK TO ME. This is what you WANT. AN IDENTITY.
>
> And this my dearest 'all' is driven by ego. Nothing else.
>
> So take a good look at yourselves.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> `, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
>
> + don't be cool
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
> 'Mountain' state is 'symbolic' of a zen-master state, that is one who has
> conquered himself, all of his weaknesses and self-delusions, and has
> overcome his human-ness.
>
being human is not a flaw. humans are perfectly human.
the goal is enlightenment.
the goal is NOT a state of inhumaness, un-human, post human (or whatever it
is you think you are)
stop appropriating eastern philosophy. you are not qualified to interpret
or teach anything you may have [mis]read.
david goldschmidt
> Dogen you are not.
>
> In fact Joseph's life-force is very small. He's rigid, inflexible, and
> brutish. Secondly, Joseph lacks proper capability to orgasm which is
> standard of asleep sexual force, and without such awakening there is no
> development to a state of fluid, conscious and vital ki.
>
> His idiotic and psychotic wishful thinking about my 'fear and hatred' of
> him is little but the tactic of a cowardly dog who lacks power, and who
> thinks that mental tricks would psyche-out his opponent, paired with
> spasmodic twitching, and attempts to salvage his self-importance in
> public. Nevermind that he fancies himself a percieved 'enemy'--even though
> it has been made abundantly clear that nobody is attacking him.
>
> The depiction of his state is simply a 'portrait'--and I paint it as is.
>
> I neither like nor dislike Joseph, yet he's a useful example of the kind
> of idiot who damages others, and who is unfortunately become the udulated
> 'hero' in the face of disappearance of proper spiritual traditions.
>
> The other point of the portrait is this: that this kind of behavior is not
> powerful, not knowledgeable, and not life. It is the behavior of a man who
> is impotent to PERCEIVE so he must claw at the 'masks' of others. The
> realization that one wears a mask is certainly one of the first steps
> to conscious evolution. The next step is not 'dropping the mask and baring
> your soul' however, and this psychotic trend is completely stupid.
>
> The world proper (not human) is not short in Beings who'd love to feed
> on human essense-energy (as it is one of the: purest energies), and one
> is not given this essence so one may piss it away. The 'mask' is a
> necessity--and the proper form of evolution is to SEE behind the mask
> (which is quite feasible), for those for whom this is possible.
>
> For the REST the soul which each human carries is to remain HIDDEN.
> Nobody owes anybody to reveal, show and otherwise make available its
> soul or any part of itself. It is a personal and private business. For
> that matter, nobody owes not anybody ELSE not a whit of their privacy at
> all. AT ALL.
>
> When a human chooses to appear in public, in a responsible manner, it is
> up to the individual human to determine how, to what extent, in what
> manner, and how much of itself it is to reveal. In a situation of
> responsible adults, anyone else would naturally simply feel honored
> and blessed at another's presence--in whatever 'minimal' form it may be.
>
> Critique is idiotic nonsense. One can either assist or not assist.
> Those who can assist are very few--and while I'm not indicating
> discouragement of seeking assistance, advice, help or conversations,
> this posing of *I'm a shaman' *I'm influenced by Sufism* etc etc.
> is drivel. One is neither a shaman, nor a sufi, nor a gnostic christian,
> nor any of this stuff being thrown around if one is a. not awakened b.
> not in direct contact with a 'school' or 'teacher' who is transmitting
> energetic material (and Im not implying human teachers necessarily).
>
> All else is kaput. Wishes, fantasies. 'Dreams'. While i am also not
> discouraging anyone to pursue such interests, the achievement of such
> 'titles' are not trivial. They area pplicable to beings who HAVE done
> work, who ARE awake / evolved, not just to any idiot who is 'fascinated
> by' for whatever reasons-career, he saw another monkey do it,
> self-aggrandizement, etc.
>
> On the subjects of 'power' and 'knowledge' and Truth--they certainly
> exist in an absolute sense, in fact your average human's 'existence'
> is far more emphimeral than those. The reactionary knee-jerkisms
> to the former two are thproughly revealing of many of the posters
> egotistical, diseases, jealous, self-important natures, as well as of your
> pathetic ignorance on such matters and their true nature.
>
> Neither power nor knowledge are made available to egotistical
> self-important twits who 'cling' to them as if they're property.
> Power in particular would destroy any such imbecile.
>
> Secondly, vital energy, vital strength and self-discipline are
> a life-necessity for all humans. This is not brute force. This is not
> aggression. Refusal to tolerate crap is not a 'clenched fist'--
> never has been, nor will it be. The cultivation of ki in whatever form (I
> am not advocating all run out and become japanese / chinese) is VITAL.
>
> On THESE lists what the majority of posters do is debase others,
> attempt to constrict and cut off ki circulation, and cripple any
> human unfortunate enough to has started any sort of development.
> This is all passed on under the guise of 'dialogue' 'discourse'
> 'critique' and hell--'performance art'.
>
> A very large section of posters 'stay quiet' or form little 'elite groups'
> where they stick together and defend each other, huddled in their sleep.
> Rather the opposite of david blah's post, my presence can only be
> threatening to idiots who want to pretend that they are 'important'
> things they are not. And by the way his plea for anycopyright because he
> wants to deface corporate logos, is driven by the same impulse that
> causes one to 'claw' at masks--he wants appropriation of power that is not
> his. Logos are in many aspects derived from 'shields' 'crests' and various
> other similar 'masking' devices, and the REAL IMPULSE is to shatter the
> shield. This is all good and fine if it were directed towards 'the
> narcissistic mirror of self-reflection,' but in ever is. Cause the problem
> is never with ONE, it's always somebody else's fault. Nevermind that this
> gets transferred to the reproductive / fucking impulses and women are
> forthe most part 'shields' or mirrors, so this murderous impulse gets
> transferred to them.
>
> Sanity is not expected however.
>
> The kind of 'honesty' that you attempt to preach does not exist.
> It's merely an attempt to SLOT humans and tag them with an easy label.
> The pathetic weakness of an ape who cannot deal with reality, and seeks
> security, which in turn manifests as psychotic control mechanisms.
>
> What you want is not HONESTY. You want a flat, simple, predictable,
> familiar IDENTITY with which the human is to IDENTIFY WITH. *Oh him
> / her*. The figured out human. The one with the 'personal quirks and
> weaknesses' that somehow make him / her appear less threatening.
> Certainly NOT one who doesn't HAVE any because that'll be a reminder
> of your own state, and that one must work to overcome these things,
> not pretend that they're ornamental jewelry. A weak and 'quirky'
> human is controllable. Safe. Asleep. A strong, aware nd conscious
> Being is not 'predictable'. Not 'controllable'. Never twice the same.
> Never familiar. Connected to the source of knowledge, and to degrees
> available to its being omniscient. Autonomous. And among other things
> free. But that is not 'interesting'. A human victim twitching in its
> trap--be it anger, or making a mistake due to sleep-state, attachment
> and preferably DYING etc. is FAR MORE INTERESTING. Far from artistic
> sensibility, intelligence, and talent, this kind of behavior is informed
> by idiotic stupor and a morbid sado-masochistic pornographic murder
> impulse. This does not come from one capable of genuinely enjoying Self,
> Life, and others, and capable of creation.
>
> The reality of the matter is that in FACT I am not wearing a mask in this
> situation because I am capable of doing so in public for some periods of
> time and protecting myself. What you are SCREAMINg about is that I AM NOT
> A MASK. Because were I A MASK, and IDENTITY, you would know how to relate.
> You'd know which holes to look for, and which buttons to push. What makes
> 'me' tick. The truly sad thing is that your so-elated 'human' contacts
> are rarely joyous. You always seek to relate to another through its
> 'weakness' or 'pain'--and when you don't find any you're BENT on hurting
> the other human in order to 'teach life'. Some of you even have the gal to
> claim that they engage in this sadism 'out of compassion (Max Herman,
> Peter von Brandenburg).' Compassion is the ability to transform another's
> pain into 'love'--that is to heal. This is available to awakened
> individuals mostly as well, although I've had the pleasure of encoyntering
> some who doit unconsciously due to 'special' forces working through them.
> Slapping people around like a butcher with flat stereotypical projections
> is not 'compassionate'. Not only that but it strengthens the 'human'
> masochistic impulse (hit me, I deserve it).
>
> As is, when writing to 'me', you're screaming at a void, and projecting
> all sort of imnecilities. You are not trying to UNMASK me. You are trying
> to DICTATE A MASK TO ME. This is what you WANT. AN IDENTITY.
>
> And this my dearest 'all' is driven by ego. Nothing else.
>
> So take a good look at yourselves.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> `, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
>
> + don't be cool
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>